Not fixed but the Watts call was at best 50:50 and it's the perception of the way 50:50s go that is the wider issue. It's like when Ellis gets a crusher at Wembley and nothing is done but then gets yellow and a ban for the same thing 5 days later. It's like when Rob Burrow sticks his nut on but the video ref (Hicks) keeps his mic switched off half an hour after he called out Ellis on that same mic to the referee. These are the things that understandably irk fans who pay a great deal of money to watch. The incident last night with Mahe being tackled in the first half near our line then getting a push in the face was a better example of just how poor Hicks is as a referee. He should have called held and then taken action a long time before that blew up. He is one of the worst referees I've ever seen regardless of whether Hull are playing or not. Unable to control a game and unable to get through any game without making key mistakes. The call that cost us was the clear obstruction Wigan did 10m from their own line towards the end of the match when we were winning by two. That was a clear penalty but he didn't want to give it. As ever the ones that aren't given are more costly than those that are.

Every game has iffy decisions - you could probably add or subtract 6 points from both teams, depending on who you support, putting the result of close games in the hands of the ref.

Why would they? It's nonsense to suggest that.

Believe it or not there is no anti-Hull FC conspiracy at the top. If we miss out it's our own fault for too many poor results such as Leigh at home, Catalans x2, Huddersfield at home, Salford at home etc.

Why still all the comments about Watts when everyone in the game now accepts it was a wrong sending off? It's history. Sending Walmsley off yesterday would have been wrong, so the ref has learned by the mistake.

Coz the RFL said it was a sending off offence.
Watts got SOS