Personally I thought we got 3 tough calls in the space of 5 minutes which took the game away from us just after Washbrook got us back in the game.
1. If the Michaels try is not a try then it is a Connor knock on and our head and feed
2. The Carlos knock on that led to the Hudds second try was initially knocked on by Huddwersfield
3. The first McGilvray try was a joke and should have at least been reviewed

So with a tired, depleted team on a foul night we are down 18 8 and all the momentum has switched to Huddersfield
I think it would have been very different but for 3 poor decisions
We did not play well but at 8 6 we were right back in it and getting on the front foot

Agree. Got a lot of attributes that suit fullback. Positional play can only come with games and familiarity

You are the blinkered one.You just cant accept there are posters on here who are not part of your cuddle crew and have different opinions to you.
Of course i know it was Tuimavave that was moved to 6 after Pryce was hauled off.My point was that Pryce was so poor anyone taking his place for the remaining game time would have looked good in comparison.
I did not overly criticise Naughton.The lad has a lot of potential. I just said in this game he was poor which was a fair reflection of his 80 minutes.
You should also know with your vast RL knowledge that most teams right edge generally has far more defending to do than the left.
With your extrasensory perception telling me Yeaman would have made a difference then you will know where i watched the game wont you?
You have no idea how i support Hull FC,how many years i have supported the club personally or financially,thats my business and so is my opinion.
If all you want is to be a sheep on RL fans forum then thats fine,but try and come up with something constructive or meaningful for a change instead of trying to be critical all the time of certain posters because you are not very good at it.

Wow Apologist club. Am made up with that

Thankyou for the high praise but my RL knowledge is already legendary.
Yes I am critical of certain posters opinions, espescially when they are exposed as your's was on Thursday. My original post stated that you have constantly said you wanted Pryce at stand off, because Tiumavave in your opinion, isn't a stand off but a centre. You wanted Carlos to centre at the expense of Yeaman. You haven't addressed my comments, merely rambled on about Pryce being so poor, that anyone would have looked better. When you constantly bang on about a view that is then proved to be wrong, isn't time to accept a little criticism. I didn't attack you personally only your opinion but you came back with nothing but snide remarks, hence the "blinkers" comment. Over the years, I have listened to fans with negative, intransigent opinions and it's boring. I have never questioned your support of the club, only your opinion, this doesn't deserve, snide comments. This is the second time you have stated I am not very good at posting? I'll carry on in my own muddled way. As for your opinion that Carlos isn't the stand off to take the club to the next level, well I was under the impression, we'd taken it but I am probably wrong in your opinion, the table and CC cup fixtures suggest otherwise. Try to answer posts, not belittle the posters.