I've watched the game on sky+ and, with the benefit of replays, there are several reasons to dispute trys for both sides.
In a non-televised match we would have been 6-0 up very early on. The ref gave a try and there's no reason to believe he would have made a different decision if the cameras hadn't been there. That may have set a very different tone to the game.

Radford said in the post match imterview that he thought we were 'outstanding without the ball'.
Outstanding is maybe too strong, but we weren't as bad as some would make out. What we did was make several unforced errors with ball in hand, some whilst in very good field position. This meant we put a lot of pressure on ourselves.

At the game yesterday, the discussion in our group, as the game progressed, centred on needing one break, one piece of luck that resulted in a try.

It came via, the brilliant, Shaul. Once that happened you could see Rovers wilt, and sure enough the flood gates opened.

A game lasts for 80 minutes. Only one team played for 80 minutes yesterday.
A truly fantastic comeback.
Well done to everyone involved.

They are also saying it's the poorest standard of rugby since SL started, but then again they would do seen as they will finish bottom & we will be in the top 8.

Great comeback Jake, no, really...........

Exactly a year since this game, the last 20 minutes of which sparked us up for our best season in a generation and set Rovers on an itinerary involving two more derby losses to an ultimate destination of relegation. What a beautiful day.

Topped off by the amazing Tony Christie.

We should book for the next SL derby.