To my mind this is awful for the club and will more than likely come back to bite us on the arris.

Sends out the wrong message to the youngsters.

You can work your way through the ranks all the way to being rated the best youngster in the competition... and then because the coach can't develop you... you are out the door.

Radford's record at bringing youngsters into the first team is decent. But how many is he developing into better players once in the team?

70k BMW aswell, the only 1 of its type in the city, Little show off.

Well, they lost another £900k across the 2 years to November 2013, despite big fees for Taylor and Green. That's before the repayments kick in for the North Stand, of course.

A couple of questions.

Multiple assertions from Rovers hierarchy that Burns would not be sold without a better player on board. Yet Hudgell says "We are now on the hunt for a new half back". Mutually exclusive those statements? Actually, maybe he means for Keating, who's already looking for an out. Unsurprising given the rich amount of scapegoating in operation, and unfair seeing that Hodgson was only allowed to pass to Burns.

It's £160k in fees inc Hodgson, but Hudgell now saying the fees will now allow spend up to full cap. Yet you say you were only £60k shy of the cap anyway. So where's the other £100k going?

Anyway I think the answer is the offer of £180k you have tabled for Danny Brough. Lunt and Brough, that's good going.