Quote: Legends and Icons " I know he runs the smc but what's this got to do with hull fc...?'"
This, unfortunately, has a rather large bearing on
this. And this latest battle has nothing to do with the name Hull Tigers and everything to do with the word 'City', the City Council, and his designs on our stadium. At the moment he seems to be losing the stadium battle, but he won't rest until he gets it or leaves Hull City. In the meantime, he will use his ownership of the SMC to put pressure on the council by eternally repeating it's a money drain and putting some of the blame on our agreement. He can make life as difficult as possible for us as he believes we are one of the council's major sticking points when it comes to the freehold.
Have you forgotten Whiteleygate? Everything he does is tactical and for a reason. I think his reasoning has backfired on this one, but that doesn't mean his motives have changed. While he remains owner of the SMC and also stadium-less, he remains a threat to us, I'm afraid, and his actions - all of them - are therefore very relevant to our club.