Quote: Mrs Barista "I've no idea what his agenda is now. He said if he didn't get the KC stadium he'd move City to Melton, but he didn't. To me the Tigers thing seems more about control/winning a pointless argument than the underlying issue, but I struggle to see commercial benefits of the size he claims from a rebrand.'"
I agree.
To what end? The K.C. can't hold a bigger crowd, an extension to the stadium wouldn't really make sense. So flogging the Tiger brand far and wide may generate some passing interest, but what financial gain could be made?