What I found interesting in his open letter was the part stating that another club had made an application to the FA for the name 'Hull Tigers', thus forcing their hand to apply earlier to the FA for the name change. Seems odd that this came about at the same time Mr Allam wanted to change the name himself.

firstly we had tickets for tenner then moving to melton then walking away then ticket prices going up, blokes only looking after himself. he couldnt give 2 monkeys about hull

I wondered if some supporter group was behind it to stop him doing it or maybe it just isn't true

It was a deliberate act by one of the Hull City aficionados. A group of them came up with the theory that the name-change coup would be scuppered if the Hull Tigers name was already spoken for. One of the group proceeded to attempt just that, and applied to the FA to register the name of the local amateur club he is involved with as Hull Tigers. Happened as all this was first kicking off, I believe.

I think the open letter is very patronising. "Now hush, you ignorant supporters, and leave the business side of things to the owners. If you don't, we're off again." Apart from the undeniable facts that they've still not provided evidence of sponsors only interested in the Hull Tigers brand (surely still marketable as a nickname and image just as much as the official name would be) and that as such wonderful businessmen they've increased Hull City's debt from £30M to £100M in two years (a far worse record than Bartlett), and run the SMC into the ground with vast losses - the first owners to achieve this incomprehensible feat.

Until they provide tangible proof that [ionly[/i changing the name to Hull Tigers will bring the revenue they crave why should anyone give the "wet finger in the air" story lip-service? The letter is much politer, though, hence Ehab's name against it in an attempt to mitigate himself from his shrieking, insulting father. Too little too late, I reckon. I bet they've got wind that noises coming from the FA aren't favourable.

Don't forget the Allam golden rule - everything he says and does is with one motivation, acquisition of that stadium. Nowt's changed there, it's the only thing that'll get him out of the financial nightmare he's found himself in. They're desperate. I still believe this whole crazy Tigers thing is some bizarre plot to get the fans back clamouring against the council. Problem is, even the most vehement council-haters amongst the fans (our very own scooter-boy being one of them) are now in sympathy with HCC and can finally see through Allam's crude 'Sporting Village' smoke and mirrors. Ironically, it is the Hull Tigers thing that has dashed the scales from their eyes. Many of them want him out, even if it means condemnation to the lower leagues again.

The whole thing has been a PR disaster for them, if they had released that letter when the idea first raised it head they still wouldn't have got every fan on board, but there would have been a lot more fans willing to give it a go.

If I was a City fan i'd be praying that they stay up, as if they go down I can see the whole club collapsing like a pack of cards...he has massively increased the wage bill, and you can't see Tiger Beer, Tiger Airlines or whoever it is he thinks he can attract being interested in Championship football.

I don't believe he seriously expects to find the sponsorship necessary to compensate for the revenue the freehold of the stadium would had given him from companies purely interested in the Tiger brand. What sort of business targets sponsorship solely from one tiny percentage of what's available? It's like me deciding to buy a new car. I am open to all makes, models, colours etc, and just want the best deal. So instead of perusing the whole market, I just choose a Seat catalogue and pick from there.

This whole 'Tigers is essential to attract sponsors' stuff is a massive red herring.

I understand the need to generate more income, after he has ploughed so much money into the club. But I think the fans would have been more easily persuaded, if he had done this name change thing correctly and asked the fans first or done research before storming in and demanding everyone to agree with him. PR disaster!

Will the name change really make that much of a dent in the bills? What are you looking to gain on top of your current sponsorship deals?

More worrying are the figures that they have released, outside of the Prem the club could be back to pre Allam days it will only take a bad run of results

I agree.
To what end? The K.C. can't hold a bigger crowd, an extension to the stadium wouldn't really make sense. So flogging the Tiger brand far and wide may generate some passing interest, but what financial gain could be made?

The letter is just another sorry chapter in the Allam saga. They've mortgaged City to the hilt while trying to gain the freehold of the KC. They've fallen out with the council so want City removed from the club name. The sponsorship side show is just another 'move to Melton' episode. Shambolic all round.

As the actual name change of the soccer club has NO RELEVANCE to the dealings of the SMC, and therefore NO RELEVANCE to Hull FC then whay is this being discussed on here ? I agree the OP did say "slightly O/T" but this is totally O/T.

personally I think the Allams are sulky, petulant and arrogant, but again that's not an opinion of relevance to this board. I can't stand Hull Sh1tty and don't want to read about or talk about them on here