I agree clubs have been mismanaged but the current rl supremo's have known and allowed this to go on, how have they let this happen if it had been fc or kr it would have been tough go and play in the lower leagues. Bradford London and Wakefield should get the same treatment has Rangers did in the Scottish fa and give other teams a chance.

Salford & fans?

I am not one to state our fans are better than yours or moan about how many fans a club has, after all I want London in SL. But unless I have missed something I have yet to see any evidence of the people of Salford buying into the Salford revolution other than a few hardened fans on twitter. Koucash will be off sooner or later. No doubt quoting how he was prevented from doing. What he wants how he wants to do it. The only positive for him will be that he will lose a lot less than he would if it was football club he was buying.

As for Hudge well from where I'm standing I believe he has made massive losses while in charge at HKR and has very little to show for it. Hardly a shinning example of how to run a club. They have improved from lower league to big. League safety but at what personal cost to him?

Totally agree on the punishment, just disagree with the club bosses that want to reduce the number of teams in our competition. Sheffield have managed to be very successful with hardly any fans and working within their budget. A club like them could easily operate in Super League with the amount of money SL clubs get. By all means punish the clubs that overspend, but replace them with teams like Sheffield and Featherstone who have achieved loads sticking within an absolutely minuscule budget. We have to rid ourselves of this ridiculous blame culture in RL. Every club knows their financial restrictions at the start of the season, and it's up to them to work within those budgets.

Running a club at breakeven is extraordinarily difficult when others aren't. I suspect as much of it comes down to owner subsidy as it does good management in most cases. Saints lose more money than Bradford and Wakefield, iirc, but nobody complains about their profligacy, because McManus picks up the tab.
Because he can, so they're living within their current means. And clubs should be allowed to find their level - Sheffield and Featherstone do okay on smaller budgets, as you say, though at a lower level, against clubs with smaller budgets still. It's just the gap between levels is more of a chasm nowadays, to the point that risking falling into in by being prudent might actually be imprudent.

Would the television deal be cut? Did it go up as a result of going from 12 to 14? I genuinely don't remember. I don't see why top players' wages would increase - there are other factors as play, but a higher worker to employer ratio would likely have a deflationary effect in the short term.

Where I think NH was right, was in that the RFL has been too interventionist. To the question, 'so you'd have them stand by and do nothing when a club is struggling?' with minor caveats, I'd say 'yes'. They're governing body not an emergency service for clubs that have imperilled themselves. RL is a competition and by helping one, you're handicapping the others. And then once you've helped one, you make it your thankless duty to help others and it is never ending.

Hudge and AP sing off the same hymn sheet when it comes to the super league structure

the fit and proper persons test should in theory prevent this kind of thing, but sadly we are seeing more and more examples of its failings - right across sport, not just in RL

It should pick out the spivs and ne'er do wells, hopefully. But in RL, has that been a major problem? I think most of them have meant well, it's just much easier to lose money than make it in RL. That probably keeps the shady characters out as much as anything. I mean, looking through SL's benefactor-owners, they've got pretty good records in business and yet they nearly all lose money at this.

The whole idea of making money in rl is a comlete pipe dream, nearly all clubs make a loss and the only one I can think of that makes a profit of any kind (leeds) I wonder how real that is and how propped up by other income it is.

That means the only way of running a successful club is to have a rich fan/benfactor plowing in cash purely because he wants to. Moran being the prime example.

Even if, and it will never happen, rl became a top, cash rich sport the players would just get paid more and the debts would raise proportionately, football being the prime example.

Sport as a whole is a fools game as investment, just glad there are a few fools about but in answer to the op is nh a name to run the game then I'd say no. He's too big a fan of one club, thd only way to run it like that is a comittee of chairmen and that'd be a nightmare. I personally think its a thankless task with unachievable goals

Surely Wigan made a profit last season . The double , highest average Att in the league , a wealth of home grown kids in the squad and the world record fee for Sam Tomkins ? If they didn't make a profit then were all doomed

On the SL review show,Koucash said he didn't know about the salary cap when he bought Salford,he did a really good check didn't he.He also wants marquee signing exempt from cap,I would sooner see clubs re-warded for bringing players through and having 10 yrs at club...I know the £50.000 rule is in but would like to see it as per player.As things stand,much prefer AP to Dr Koucash as Koucash will leg it and leave Salford in Sh1t street

Was talking to the bro-in-law who is a pass holder at Wigan and he said they have over a million in the bank after the Tomkins and Hansen transfers