Quote AirlieBird82="AirlieBird82"I was talking about those isolated games though. Repeatedly. '"
I know. But it's missing the point to say we can be more consistent and just narrow the margin of defeat in those games. Consistency, by its very nature, has to apply to all the performances. So if we play consistently better, yes, we'll narrow the margin of defeat in certain games, but we'll also move from narrow defeat to winning in others.
Quote AirlieBird82="AirlieBird82"I think its more important that we close the gap between our best and worst performances.'"
Absolutely. Taking Wembley and last week aside, some of our worst performances came in defeats to Cas, Wakey and Bradford. All games we could/should have won, if we'd played to anything like our potential.
Quote AirlieBird82="AirlieBird82"If we finish with, say, two more points next season but finished seventh in the table would you consider that successful or a failure?'"
I'd consider it highly unlikely since the team in 7th usually has around 28 points and has never had more than 29 (once) since we went to a 14 team division.
Quote AirlieBird82="AirlieBird82"I agree that that would also be an improvement. All I'm saying is I would much rather see us get rid of the really bad performances and if we do then I will consider that an improvement.
Maybe not in terms of league position but if we are bridging the gap between those best and worst performances then that is an improvement in my opinion.'"
But as I keep trying to point out, you can't improve performances and still win fewer games. It doesn't work like that. If we improve our attack and still lose more games, then our defence must be poorer. If the overall standard of performance improves, we will, by definition, win more games.