Quote Chris71="Chris71"The game at Widnes was either just an unfortunate game where anything and everything that could go wrong did or just highlighted the problems the club still has re getting a decent product on to the pitch consistently.'"
I think its a bit of both tbh.
We've had the makings of some decent performances this season and some horrors, but we still have problems. Losing Ellis before a ball was kicked in anger has had more of an impact than I thought it would, and not having a settled half back pairing hasn't helped (hands up who thought Seymour would have a good game on Sat?). Holdsworth and Horne looked decent together, but players will get injured and we have to have a back up plan. With respect to Seymour (who I liked the look of in his first year - in parts) he isn't the back up plan, unfortunately.
The inside ball to to the second row (that NEVER works) has returned with the return of Tickle (and don't get me wrong I think he's a great player), and needs to be stopped. Why do we not use it when he isn't in the side??????
I'm not doubting Gentle, although I was never really an "in Gentle we trust" disciple, but I still found it odd that Green and Crooks were left out on Sat. Did we think Widnes = easy?
I was in Leeds a lot at the weekend and on Sunday saw a car with a Rhinos sticker in the window, which, Pavlov's dog style, made me boo and mutter "we all hate Leeds". But then I thought "why?" Yes they beat us a lot and it was awesome to smash them last year, but [uthey are the club we should be aspiring to be.[/u We have a fantastic (with notable exceptions) fanbase. We have a decent coaching set up. We have a brilliant stadium. We have a decent set of players. We've got rid of what was holding us back (the last board and Agar imo). What is stopping us trying to be like Leeds? Solve that one and we could be up there challenging.