The trouble with Seymour is that as one of the pivots in a team he has to be a bit better than average (which he is)its like he cant be arrsed,its just gunna get embarassing for him unless he pulls his finger out.Total waste of money

Maybe seymour has better things to do with his time

He made some mistakes in the Leeds game but I couldn't fault his effort.

Seymour, as far as we are aware, is meeting the conditions of his employment, so no reason for him to walk away. Anyway who thinks he should is clearly not very sensible.

If he'd been a local lad everyone would be saying "give him chance" etc. etc.

While he may not be the best scrum half, to question his attitude is offensive and complete rubbish.

Indeed, I know a few people on here that would probably be out of a job within minutes if they applied the same logic to themselves as they appear to want to for Seymour.

Over the yeas I've seen plenty of FC players tossing it off and not deserving a wage through lack of effort. Seymour is not in that group.

I could name at least 4, but they were "local lads" so they never got criticised, and when anyone did criticise they "weren't a real fan"

Maybe he can't 'd' because he has been treated so poorly during the off season. Seymour is a cut above anyone else at your club in his position. I think Gentle is mad not to play him, unless there are off the field issues.

Has to be something else going on. He's been 1st choice half back at 3 NRL clubs so it easily capable of doing a job in SL

You could certainly see why his attitude wouldn't be great, how many of us would be happy being publicly deemed not good enough by the owner. Then watch as your company openly tries to replace you for the best part of six months.
But his attitude is right, according to Gentle. I think his confidence is non-existent and probably struggles with motivation, which plain and simply is Pearson's, Gentles and McRae's faults.