I am sure pearson is less bothered about the whole thing, quite frankly we should not even rise to the situation as its below us in so many ways

The reasons why this is happening now is that a certain family are trying to force the council into selling the stadium, the reason they refused first time round was that he wanted to take out a mortgage and not buy with his own so called wealth that is why the council would not let him have it to put a venue with no debt into debt, at the end of the day unless city get promoted to the prem which is highly unlikely and he continues to lose millions every season then he will simply walk away, he hasn,t got the wealth to run a prem club and pay prem wages. If you compare him to some of the owners in the prem he looks like he,s on dole. Just another threepence hapeney millionaire trying to make himself look like he,s got more money than he has

, he,ll soon get bored and clear off somewhere else ps dont buy his generators

A rugby league city always was and always will be

I work at the learning zone college and to my knowledge we don't pay to have stuff put up. Also it's worth noting they took down a signed FC shirt off the wall and for some reason only a rovers shirt and city shirt are present!

then feel free to do nothing

My reply would have worked better if part way through editing it my connection hadn't crashed out meaning what I put made no sense.

Sorry all.

The picture fiasco is a problem, but for me this is the agenda that should be pushed.....
1 Why is the SMC losing money?
2 Why is the (tax payer) stadium criminally underused?
3 Why is the (tax payer) stadium criminally overpriced?
4 Have other sports(baskeball etc) been priced out of the facilities?

So, I am stupid for doing something am I?

fair enough

[url=http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/Rugby-legend-Johnny-Whiteley-awarded-honorary/story-15061764-detail/story.htmlThis man deserves better[/url

I think additional arguments might dilute your main one. The Jonny Whiteley one is simple, legitimate and should have widespread support. Going after other targets is trickier and potentially more controversial. I wouldn't be opening other fronts at this point. fwiw.

Couldn't be further from the truth.

I am probably wrong but could it have anything to do with the lower gates for both clubs in recent years?