Any clues how much the charge is for putting the pictures up?

It could make FC look very small time if it's a minimal sum.

The issue is not primarily about money. As Councillor Brown pointed out, the sums involved are peanuts compared to the rent we pay. There are three issues:

1. What justification can there be for charging for the display of pictures and memorabilia that were already on display?
2. City having to pay this charge is basically just the Allams moving cash from one pocket to the other.
3. Why should [ianyone[/i have to pay for pictures of Johnny Whitely to be displayed in the suite named after him?

It's the last point which has triggered the mass response.

A warning. Any trolling on this issue from you will not be tolerated. And there will be no further warnings.

But if you paid the 'peanuts' there's no argument to be had.

I'm sure the Council have bigger issues they should be discussing than FC being asked to pay the same as other tenants to use the facility.


I'm not trolling. I never have. I just have a different opinion and that's what boards are about so knock the threats on the head it makes you look paranoid.

For the mods:
Is it possible to have a sticky with all these ‘what to do, and who to contact posts’?

All this crowing could actually be making the Situation between Allam and Pearson worse. You may be doing more damage in the long run. Just a thought

The figure i have been told is a five figure sum, in fact its more than your average working man earns in a year.

Looks like a troll, smells like a troll......hmmmm.

Just like Larvin and Twitter eh?

I'll be the judge of that, ta.

Nobody is interested in your pointless and deliberately inflammatory opinions. You post purely to start arguments, and that's the very definition of trolling.

In fact - goodbye.

I didn't realise that the situation between Larvin and Twitter had got worse. What happened?