As a neutral to me that was telling - on their line 3 times in first 7 mins. Not may teams with top 6 aspirations would have come away with 0 points. Early days though.

I have heard today that City recently trained on the pitch, but it wasn't from the most reliable of sources so could easily be bullcrap designed to wind up FC fans.

While I agree that there is a personal vendetta going on here, I disagree that they don't care about FC. They know they'd have a much better chance of owning the KC if we weren't tenants, so if they can make it untenable for us to remain there they'd see that as a win.

No. They don't!! The SMC has a watertight lease on the KC.. There is no breaking that service agreement!!

It's watertight provided terms aren't breached. Not suggesting for a second they have been, just that if either council or SMC don't fulfil their obligations, surely the contract would be broken? Don't know what the terms are, like. Doubt there's anything about treating tenants equitably as impartial landlord and custodian of the council's community asset though.

.

It will be intersting if we lose tomorrow night on goal kicks!