It was said last night because of the weather and because they got so much done in Tenerife that and indoor training area would be a top priority for the first team. All in all if we cant spend more than the cap then improving the training conditions etc is what we will invest in instead.

That was one of the things that made me think the Larvin investment at KR of £15m was dubious, you don't need to spend that kind of money on an RL team with the salary cap in place.

That's maybe why we all joked how we were sure the investment was going to come at some point i mean its in the paper everyday surly it must come....................

Ha Ha

Ps Pearson also added that if it did come the investment because it is in the paper everyday so it must be true and he is stood there on craven parks ground so its a deffo from what ive heard...........
He said if it did come then all that would do is keep us on our toes to be the best team in the city.

On the very narrow point of spending £15 million on a [iclub[/i - well I'm not sure if it has ever been mentioned on here, but Hull KR run at loss of hundreds of thousands of pounds a year, as it is. A new South Stand, high end training facilities, using the elastic in the cap, a handful of transfer fees - we could, hypothetically, soon go through it.
How much has McManus put in at Saints? Wouldn't be surprised if it isn't far off.

No idea, we'll have to wait and see if this investment comes off for you guys and we can discuss it then, otherwise we'll get told off for thread drift.

You might indeed.

Back on topic, then - I've heard AP suggested there may some changes in the governance of the sport. Can anybody give a bit more detail as to what he said/hinted at?

AP mentioned that some clubs, mainly wigan are pushing for clubs to run superleague, something similar to what football clubs do in the Premiership, having more control and say on what happens

Mixed feelings on that, tbh. They'd have to appoint somebody to do what the rfl do now, and while they might do it better, there is a danger of fragmentation of the sport.
For example - who'd run the international game, the SL club's or the RFL?

It'd be difficult for those appointed to pursue a vision, trying satisfy the conflicting agendas of some pretty diverse clubs.

At least when the PL teams left the FL, they had the FA to go to, mixed as their performance has been.

All that said, following on from the mess of licensing and the shortage of cash around the sport, change is needed. I just hope they don't replace the captain and leave the course unaltered.

From what AP said it seems that the fiasco of the Stobart deal and the ensuing difficulties in getting a sponsor for this season who wants to pay decent money may have tipped the clubs into this stance. Some changes seem likely even if it doesn't go the whole hog with the clubs running the sport.

Heard a runour that larvin is a front for some developers who just want to get their hands on land and the bulk of the cash will go on commercial developments that have nothing to do with rovers

If I had £15m to invest in a commercial property deal, I doubt I'd select Larvin & Les to front it up via Twitter and start personal arguments with individual Rovers fans.

Rovers don't own the ground and Craven Park is hardly a prime leisure/commercial zone. Sounds like the sort of thing the council would fall over themselves to create a joint venture in, therefore. A plausible rumour.