If we end up in a situation where we play saints and they won't allow Foster to play we should get our own back by not allowing Turner to play!

Scored over 100 points for us in 8 games. Played really well tonight, full of confidence and looked stronger on the kick return.

Proved me wrong tonight, I thought he was just a poser who was good at kicking, tonight he showed why he was hyped up as being one of the best young players around a year or two ago.

But what if you have Saints in the semis....Wigan might choose Leeds/Cats in clubcall to avoid facing you?

Unlikely, our record against Wigan is absolutely abysmal! I'm sure we'd be their first choice.

I reckon you made the mistake of listening to some Saints fans.



I've always believed in Foster. He's a good player and even when he makes mistakes or doesn't get over all his kicks, he never stops working his butt off for the team (if he misses a kick you will always see him telling himself off). He has a good rugby brain, good positioning, is a good finisher, can catch a bomb, has pace and works hard to get the kick returns back in spite of his slight frame. All he needs is a half decent centre, just like any other winger.

Amazed when I heard he'd played in the last 2 GF's

He didn't let us down in either of them.

Think I would have preferred Foster over Crookes but too late now with Crookes due to be announced imminently.

Foster has stated all along that he is here on loan and his aim was to force his way back into the Saints squad, his rhetoric has changed though and on the website he talks about how he'd love to have a shot at the GF with FC.

Would be ironic if we got there and faced Saints and they refused to let him play.......pipe dream of course

think foster has done great for us, but cant see him stopping,crookes has got pace to burn something which apart from briscoe we have lacked,

And Lineham is faster than everyone else at the club!