I'm not saying under any circumstance that I would want him back.

But when he does get it right he doesn't half look like a world beater, his technique and disguise is amazing. He has so much time and makes it look so easy. Only the next play as we all know, he might just fart out of his brain and mess it all up.

So the general concensus on here is that Hall is rubbish and you'd rather have the likes of Seymour at half back! You want a half back with a touch of self arrogance, thats a plus point for a top half.

I think it's a real testament to the rest of our squad that we're in the top 6. We are there without any half backs. Look at Hanbury the other night, look at young Wood at Wakey, even these would make a massive difference to us. Hall would have been a massive improvement at 6 to us this season.

I agree with you Lummy, the kid was great going forward & wouldn't have been so exposed defensively at stand off.
Whenever I have heard Craig speak, he has always conducted himself with dignity, and to my knowledge did not slag Hull off when we let him go as he might have done.

Sorry but i must have a better memory than both Lummy and White Clover
99.9% of those canvassed in the survey said craig hall was shiiit!
I couldnt give a rats ass if he can speak in public or sounds like Daffy duck, wether he slagged us off or not or wether he wears black and white pyjamas to bed,Craig Hall under pressure looks like a rabit in the headlights , and despite what some would say there was a collective sigh of relief when he left!!!!
the term chocolate fireguard comes to mind!!! he was cak, is cak and will remain cak

And I think we'll leave it there. The whole Craig Hall thing has been done to death numerous times and there's nothing new left to say. Plus he's a Rovers player and if anyone really wants to discuss his strengths/shortcomings then their forum is the place to do it.