Spot on, i just thought it was our group who see how predictable it is, it's not as if he kicks it in a different way like Brough did or Sinfield or Richards do with plenty of height or a spiralling ball.

Spot on. Hall used to try the miracle run down the line and get bundled into touch all the time. Thought he went well personally and it's all valuable game time. As for those saying we didn't play well and didn't deserve to win I'd say Hudds weren't any better and in fact I'd bet we made more clean breaks in the game. Yes we weren't great but IMO we were the slightly better side.

I remember one moment in the second half were he had a chance to go on the outside and cut inside. I don't think he bottled it but took a safety first approach. Probably down to the fact he isn't a winger and wasn't confident of having the pace or strength to go past George.

Funny game really. At times it reminded me of last year when we were clueless at times under Agar. Seymour needs a partner to help him out. I thought Whiting did ok but his lack of pace was shown in Hudds first try. Was encouraged by Nicklaus spell at hooker. He gave a few daft pens away but his passing was quick and accurate from dummy half. We need to follow the runner because when we do make the odd break there is never anyone there and I think we badly miss a 4th big prop on the bench to keep up the momentum. Overall its a win and we have played better this season and lossed.

I thought Nicklas looked out his depth, passing was very poor and during his spell we looked our poorist, as soon as Heremia comes on we seem to step up a gear.

If we need another hooker I would look to give either Cunningham or Jackson some gametime.

try snapping up young Pelissier at Catalans - he's becoming a decent hooker with a good teacher in Henderson (and Fisher) but he can't get in the first team on a regular basis - still young and getting better with each game - someone should take a chance on him IMO