And the season before... and the season before... zzzzzzzzzz...

We'll have to agree to differ although I find it hard to believe the guy responsible for the day to day running of the club has no responsibility for or say in what happens in the most important aspect of the club. rule has been on the BOD for years. He was marketing director before he became CEO I believe

Just wrong,

the CEO is responsible in the sense that if something goes wrong its his fault,

But a good CEO is a strategist, who trusts his staff to deliver on that strategy,

Its only 'his fault' with respect to the buck stopping with him, its not his actions that have led to the demise of our club, far from it,

Do you expect him to pop on a jersey and get on the field?

It's the CEO's 'fault' if his judgement is so bad that he puts his trust in halfwits like Rich Agar to deliver on his strategy.

OK we'll agree to differ.

Believe it or not I do actually respect your views.

I'm fairly sure Rule only became a Director recently. He was Marketing Director before becoming CEO, but was not actually a Director.

Maybe someone who's interested enough can check with Companies House and find out.

Just wrong

The CEO has responsibility and therefore needs to ensure that things are happening. His lack of action has led us to where we are