I rarely post on this board but read threads every day. After last nights debacle I felt impelled to analyse our results under Agar and compare those to Sharp.

Agar:

Season W D L Win %
2011 1 0 5 16.67%
2010 16 0 12 57.14%
2009 10 0 17 37.03%
2008 4 0 9 30.77% (starting Sts game after Sharp sacked)
Total 31 0 43 41.89%

Sharp:

Season W D L Win %
2008 4 1 9 28.57%
2007 15 2 12 51.72%
2006 12 0 5 70.54% (starting Huds game after Kear sacked)
Total 31 3 26 51.67%

Both coaches stats include play off games but not Challenge Cup games.

As can be seen Sharp had a far superior win ratio then agar when he was sacked. In fact when Agar was given his new contract last year he only had a win ratio of 34.09%!

It could be argued that Agar has a far superior squad to work with then Sharp did and certainly has had more money to spend.

I am far from a lover of Peter Sharp and felt totally underwhelmed by his appointment at the time just like I was with Agars, but when faced with such evidence how can the board justify keeping Agar in a job?

I stupidly renewed my pass this year (before Berrigan left) but have not been to a game so far this season and will not until Agar is replaced with a quality coach.

Sadly supporting Hull FC has become a chore rather than a pleasure and this seems to be becoming the thoughts of the masses!

I just hope the board see sense before it is too late!

TBH I think that's true of both Sharp and Kear, which is another thing that makes it so strange how much support Agar has had. It's almost as if the club are overcompensating.

Quote: Phil O'Stein "You've just enhanced my worst nightmare there! I won't sleep for days with that thought in my head. You owe me some sedatives www.hullfc.com/newsarticle.aspx?n=16745 Seriously, why would we own the copyright to this photo? Unless..

Quote: Phil O'Stein "You've just enhanced my worst nightmare there! I won't sleep for days with that thought in my head. You owe me some sedatives www.hullfc.com/newsarticle.aspx?n=16745 Seriously, why would we own the copyright to this photo? Unless..

I wanted to give Agar a chance when he first took over Sharpe, but I think we signed him up to a contract WAY too early before he'd proven anything. By the end of that season, I didn't think he was the right man for the job. By the end of 2009 I was sure of it. The fact we signed him up in 2010 for another two years was outrageous. Whoever on the board is making these decisions needs to get in the same taxi as Agar.

IIRC it was more than just "becoming avaliable" he couldn't have made his interest any more obvious if he'd have painted himself bright yellow and sprayed "James Hire me Please" across the boardroom walls.

rather like Noble now, who is saying "please give me a job" "I can't wait to get back in the game" on every TV and Radio show!