Looks better than the old Hull site (and the current Rovers one). One thing that does annoy me though is that both Hull and Rovers go out of town for the majority of their design work. There are more design agencies in Hull per capita than anywhere else in the UK and while a lot of them are small fry pretenders there are some quality studios putting out great work (I should know, I work at one). It's disappointing that 2 clubs that put so much emphasis on the local community and getting support from local businesses don't return the favour when it comes to them spending their own money.

Probably a selfish rant, I'd love to do work for either Hull or Rovers.

I actually think the new site is very good and is probably amongst the best in Super League. But as we all know, 'off the field' aren't where our major problems lie - our 'off the field stuff' is generally very good. For what it's worth I think the club should be congratulated on the new site, although I'm not too sure about the fans blog thingy. I've always thought that columns/blogs from fans belong in or on fanzine websites where they can actually be slightly critical.

The one problem with the new site for me that will hopefully get sorted in the next few weeks is not having commentry on the FCTV highlights. I know I can see what's going on but it just helps if there's someone commentating on it, especially since Clarkey's done some in the past.

Other than that very impressed with the new site.

Oh, I understand, it would just be nice to have the commentary with the pictures.

Will still be watching the highlights on there though.

I love that KC Stadium photo used in the header and on the profiles page