Surely though it's now time to have an experienced guy at the helm rather than a "promising rookie coach",despite their credentials and technical ability??

after all,isn't the main criticism of Agar is that he's "out-of-his-depth and inexperienced"....

In regards to Noble,i personally think he'll steer clear of Fc knowing the restraints the board may place on him.....i may be wrong but that's my feeling.

I was of that exact mind when he was at Bradford/GB. Over the course of his Wigan spell he changed my mind a bit though, and then he also got Crusaders playing some decent stuff. I think he just plays to the strengths of the squad he has, which was overpoweringly the pack at Bradford (and he picked most of it for GB so did the same).

I'm not saying he coaches champagne rugby, but better stuff than he used to, and certainly better than we've seen from Agar.

If Agar goes, Noble is the bset man for the job (that we are capable of getting)

Won it all at Bradford, took Wigan from bottom to top 4 and took Celtic from bottom to playoffs within a very short time.

I think he would be coach to get us moving in the right direction.

What was the general reason for him getting the push at the Broncos? I mean deeper then just results? For me there isn't a cut and dry good/bad coach, all depends on circumstances, I'm not for one minute saying Henjack is the right choice for the club, I don't know enough about him, but I'd be looking for a persons character and attitude about the game rather then just what someone has achieved at another club, because the circumstances and challenges at another club would be different.

He fell out with the senior players.