Is he a yes man though, you don't get the board to suddenly spend £150k on a player if he does as he's told?

Unless it was the boards idea? Are they recouping that money by not spending the salary cap aswell?

Again no evidence of this, its just a thought.

so when we shell money out for a player its because the board want him? No credit for agar and scouts doing the work, then asking the board for the money? So when hull win its the players when we lose its agar.... your one of them?

One of what? I simply gave a scenario in which Agar could be a yes man and the club still pay a fee for a player. I even stated I had no evidence of this being the case. How about you get over yourself.

why would it be the boards idea to shell out for a player the coach hasnt asked for..... unless your hudge the grudge