Quote: monkeyshoes "i'm still hopeful of Jarrod Sammut. I'd be be happy if we signed him for 2 or 3 yrs and i think he'd be a great little ace in the hole
failing that i'd be happy with Sam Obst - he's better than no cover at all and i'd much rather see him interchange with Houghton than Washbrook any day of the week.
last season we complained at Washbrook at 6, next season it's looks like we'll complain at Washbrook at 9. oh the joys!!
FWIW Agar needs to give his head a bang if we go into 2011 without Sammut OR Obst (or Moore?)'"
Why should Agar give his head a bang? Maybe the Sammutt deal is too much for a player who might only stay one or two years? Maybe he rates Nicklas as highly as Moore and as for Obst I agree he would be a decent signing but I would play him as a hooker and not a half.
Can I ask why all of a sudden Moore is being talked so highly, if he was that good then surely a SL side would have snapped him up by now?