agree with that, if we where to have 4 friendlies then maybe try a few combinations, but with only the 2 we have got to get our starting 17 some game time together, for however long that starting 17 stays the same which i doubt will be long. ( no pun intended! )

so to answer the original question, yes definately friendlies, its gutting if you lose someone to injury in a game but its the chance thats got to be taken.

Yep, and none of this "2 x 20 minute spells" bollox either.

So Agar doesn't rate friendlies as worthwhile then , judging by the squad for Doncaster

Is he REALLY saying that Yeaman, Sharp, Long, Houghton, Radford. Westerman, Tickle and Fitzgibbon cannot play in 2 friendly matches and wouldn't benefit from it ???

Lets keep them all in cotton wool eh ? Especially as our end of season form was so good.

God knows what he is thinking about, but if he says after MM that "we were a bit underdone" remember you read it here first.

WHAT A LOAD OF B*LL*X

Your freaking me out.