Jack is in the squad so why not give him a go? would be stupid not to, see what the lad can do!

Im with you lets go with Jack his pedigree says he aint no bottler and his head wont drop.

I 100% agree. He is a FB so play him there. But Agar will go with Hall

Worth a shot Imo cant do any worse than Hall did and its a bit of experience for the Kid.

The wolves are not resting anyone for this they obviously want second place so who ever is at fullback can expect the Briers special.

Has Turner ever played FB in his life? People keep saying Briers will destroy J.Briscoe at FB but then champion playing Turner there instead. Weird.

It's like the Manu to centre idea, then he plays there and it's obvious why he plays in 'the pack.

For me if JB is good enough then he is old enough. I would rather have JB in at FB than move a player who has rarely/never played the FB role.

We will never see our younger players grow and progress if we dont show faith in them and let them have a crack at SL at the earliest opportunity. Would Horne or Cooke have got this far if they hadnt been given the chance at such young ages??

It is always a fine line when bringing players through but handled correctly it shouldnt pose a problem for his progression.

The one thing I would say is I don't know if JB is good enough or mentally ready for SL and neither do most of the fans on here but the coaching staff do so I trust them to make the right call.

Hall - can't catch , no confidence , gone anyway
Jack B - Inexperienced
Turner - Suspect under high balls and one on one tackling in the open not brilliant
So what about Washy? No flare or creativity at SO but generally solid and dependable. Turner to SO , it's what he thinks he is, Tom to centre , it's what I think he is, and Jack on the wing ...or Hall. Not a good solution but then none of the options are. Just a thought.

Lets not forget Tansey isn't exactly great in that position also.