I've mentioned plenty of times previously, with specific examples, of how he is targeted around the ruck because of his often sloppy work in the tackle. He's seen as a player to get at, but to try and avoid his strong front on defence.



Something else I've countered many times. The most often used defence of Radford is that 'he does the little/unnoticed things well'. That's just a complete non-argument, not mentioning any specifics, and is a cop-out used by people don't really know what the 'little things' are rather than get into a more technical discussion.

End of the day...if they are rewarded Testimonials then its upto the fans if they go....I personally dont bother at all with them.

Agreed. Devalues it otherwise.

Could not have put it better myself. If Radford gets a testimonial i wont be going to the events that is for sure. Horne got my support as he fully deserved it, and Yeamo although poor over the last few seasons (More down to supply than himself though) deserves a testimonial far more than Radford.

Hilarious! - He left as a hot prospect and came crawling back when he failed to live up to that early promise. I would have told him where to go. Not on one single occasion have I thought that his re-signing was a good move. Boy does this club need a coach and player enema!

He may have left as a hot prospect, but he came back a vastly improved and much decorated player, who had been a fixture in the engine room of one of the most successful sides of the time. Of course his signing was a good move, I don't feel that lee has ever let the club down on the pitch (or off it either, witness his community work) and it is he who has been let down by coaches who asked him to to jobs he just was not suited to, like being a ball playing loose forward when he was always a workhorse not a ball player.