i know they moved him to a couple of positions. i've only seen the guy once or twice but doesn't he look a bit big for someone whose supposed to be a SO? he looked it from where i was sitting anyway. TBH i think he'll be one of the ones to miss out. with O'Meley out they'll need both Radford and Cusack. i can't see them choosing Burnett over Lauaki either so it'll probably be those two out.

Shouldn't a team that aspires to be top 4 be one of them? TBH I can't see us putting 50 past anyone this season. I would love to be proved wrong tonight, but doubt it.

Possibly. Although you could as easily say that a side that finished 11th and 12th in the previous two seasons and is only halfway through restructuring from several seasons of poor recruitment and retention probably wouldn't. And that's without mentioning the disruptions to the squad this season.


Likewise. We don't have the players to really hammer a side yet, although getting all our first choices (particularly in the halves) on the pitch together for a few games in a row would increase our chances significantly.

I don't care if we win any game by just 1 point...wins a win, 2 points in the bag..

Do you get any more points for winning a game by 60 than 20? Winning by 60 would be nice but after the last 2 seasons just winning is nice. I'd take a season like 2006 were we won most games tight and got to the GF over a season like 2004 were we hammered some teams but didn't even win a play off game.

Could be the difference between finishing 4th or 5th one year.