Well here's a fool as mentioned previousley

Tansy at Full back
Whiting back to Centre
Turner and Horne stay
Moa for CACK (SORRY YAK)
Washbrook for either Houghton Berrigan both as good as each other for me
Rest stays same until Long is back

So berrigan is only as good as houghton and washbrook is better than both? Interesting assessment.

I also like your idea of having 3 centres and 14 men on the pitch. We should go well with that

You would consider dropping Berrigan for Washbrook?

Cack? Houghton & Berrigan as good as each other?

Tansey said in the paper that he wants to play full back and that was one of the reasons why he came to the club. I would put him at full back and let him float around in the attacking line. Turner and Horney did well last week and I think we do need a settle half back pairing when longy is injured. This way we are not disrupting the team too much

For me it would be Tansey back to Full back , Whiting to the bench in place of Houghton (Whiting gives more options in different positions than Houghton and would like to see Berrigan play 80 mins) and the rest of the team stays as it was last week (if all fit)

Berrigan, T Briscoe, Calderwood, Cusack, Dowes, Fitzgibbon, Hall, Horne, Houghton, Lauaki, Manu, O’Meley, Radford, Tansey, Tickle, Turner, Washbrook, Whiting, Yeaman

Hoooo Leeeeeee Poooop

Still no Moa then.

Whiting
Calderwood
Hall
Yeaman
T Briscoe
Turner
Horne
Radford
Berrigan
O’Meley
Tickle
Manu
Fitzgibbon

Cusack
Dowes
Lauaki
Tansey (Tansey should have to earn his place back after a disciplinary issue)

I'd go with that.

I'd swap Tansey and Turner, the rest picks itself.