most of those city's already have stadiums over 30,000 aswell so the extra expense can be put into better facility's rather than ground upgrades

nothing to do with the WC bid, any city that has spent money already has made a mistake, until you get confirmed as a bid city then you just keep the capital aside.

based on a conversation I had today, I think Hull will be in the twelve named as hosts, we await Tuesday.

mite not be anything to do with the world cup bid but the expenditure of the internal transport systems are sorted and dont need to be budgeted for therfore if there bids are sucesful they will have far more money to spend on other things

which world do you live in?

So, of the city's bidding, who has shelled out on trams in recent times?

Leeds?
Derby?

Sheffield was ages ago, paid for by Meadowhall

Leicester

Nottingham was years ago, paid for by Europe

deal in facts, not the mush between your ears.

facts are there they mite not have paid for them they are up and running and expanding fact

because they have'nt sat on there s and waited for the next bus to come along fact

You know nothing, which is duly noted.

Why don't you crawl back under your rock?

And neither Sheffield nor Nottingham are expanding, in fact, there are no expanding tram networks at the current time.

www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/trans ... ticle.html www.railwaygazette.com/news/sing ... irmed.html

www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/trans ... ticle.html www.railwaygazette.com/news/sing ... irmed.html

so where's that comming from then !!!!

late July 2009, funding subsequently "reconsidered"

try and be recent

You really are an arrogant prat.