As it's close season, and we now know what our squad is for 2009, I'm interested to know from my knowleageable co-fans, if you could give AGAR some advice on his 1st choice 17, and where to play OTHER players, what would it be (Stay on thread now !!!!!)
START WITH :-
For me : 1.Tansey, 2.Raynor, 3.Yeaman 4. Hall 5. Calderwood 6.Horne 7. Long. 8. Lauiki 9.Berrigan 10 O'Meeley 11.Manu 12 Fitzgibbon 13. Washbrook subs : Moa, Cussack, Tickle, Houghton
DUE TO INJURIES OR FORM : Prop Packing Order Dowes ??? who else
2nd Row : Radford, Whiting,
Loose : Whiting
Scrum Half : Berrigan, ?????
Wing / Centre : Briscoe, Turner
You know what......................... struggling with cover options........ need help........

I remember Whiting playing LF against Saints a few seasons ago and he had a stormer. I always feel like were more of a threat with Whiting on the field.

Agar know best, please don't make me laugh.He's seen the players train for the last god knows how many years and as assistant and now as head coach, and all he's proved is that he's useless in tactics, team selection and motivation.

The times he was picked at centre he could have been picked at 13. I can argue about plenty of time cos there has been. This is now pointless as we don't agree. If he gets his chance then we will see how he does, I won't be holding my breathe though.

Yes, we could have moved Radford into the centre. Good idea.



The fact is, when he was playing centre, he was the best person for that job. As I said before, it's about options. If the overall structure of the team would be weakened by playing Whiting at LF and someone less capable at centre, then, of course, it shouldn't be done.

So, no, you can't argue that there have been plenty of opportunities, because it's not true.

That's because we are. He showed enough last season when he was playing at FB to suggest that the more involved he gets, and the more times he has the ball in his hands, the more dangerous our attack will be.