Quote: Standee "The difference is Paul that the [ievidence[/i supports the observation that Agar is useless, there is no evidence to suggest people who think so are wrong.'"
Yes there is but you just don’t take it in as you believe differently.
Many have talked about the rugby we played when agar took over the rains when Kear left, but you don’t even take this as evidence that he can get a team playing ?
The main argument is it was the team playing and nothing to do with Agar but when we say it’s the team not playing this year its Agars fault Mmm.
When Peter sharp came over he admitted that he changed very little as agar had and was doing a fantastic job.
But again you don’t take this into account you have your view and everyone else be damned.
We all blamed the atrocious injuries last year for our poor performances yet its been worse this year but again that’s Agars fault.
At the begining of the year we had our best ever start to a superleague with lets face it a poor squad and six injured and no Crocker but of course this was nothing to do with Agar it was the poor opposition.
I think it is you that cannot see the evidence right in front of you.
Just my opinion though and there will be another thread I am sure where you can inform everybody of your opinion that Agar is out of his depth.
Especially if too many start to disagree with you on this one.
I'd been contemplating that for a couple of days.
who'd of thought it?? 
