hahahahaha christ

Agreed and the tackle on Tansey wasn't complete, yet again the home side got both decisions in their favour.

It was complete as soon as his ball carrying arm hit the deck while fox still had contact!!
I thought you were hard done by and vital decisions went against you but that wasn't one of them.

Now that I do agree with!!

Why?
Appears to speak a lot of sense. "Fans" of poor teams seem to claim poor refereeing costs them much more than fans of the better teams. Why is that? To try and disguise their teams own failings? The better teams take it on the chin and get on with it, the have a score denied, so what? Go and score two more.

so a top 4 side nearly had its ar5e whupped by a bottom 4 side today and only got away with it by the skin of your teeth with a full team and such an outstanding coach and an extra man on the pitch....PURE QUALITY

That does happen a lot at Craven Park doesn't it?

Was there FORWARRRRRRRRRDDDDDDDDD shouts for every Hull pass?

As I've said earlier, Fox slipped off the tackle before Tansey passed it. If he had stood up and carried on he would have been allowed to. Or say he was tackled from behind, Tanseys arms hit the floor but Fox rolled over him and lost contact. That isn't tackle made either.
When the pass was made Fox wasn't holding him and the try should have stood.

Did you not watch the game?

we nearly did..if the incompetant ref hadn`t called for a forward pass....sumtimes just sumtimes the refs are to blame you know...as they are human and do make mistakes,its not always the players contrary to popular belief.

We'll never know because BENT-ham couldn't be bothered to look at the best angle before making a decision. Why have video refs if they aren't going to look at the best view to make a decision. Whatever happened to benefit of the doubt or does that only come into play when it's Leeds, Wigan and St's?