given more time and used correctly moa could be a good player

Agreed.

Moa isn't good enough to take up a valuable non fed spot IMO.

He has the ability to be good enough imo if used correctly. He always sucks 4 tacklers in which would allow us to exploit gaps with smart half back play like at Bradford away. He layed the platform for a couple of tries there and nearly broke Burgess in half.

I think that he could become a decent impact prop, given the right conditioning and coaching so he will have to go elsewhere for that.

Everytime he comes on, he hits the defensive line harder than anyone we currently have and always takes a lot of bringing down. He also puts in some big hits in defense. It's not his fault that Agar is a clown and that he can't "work hard" like every other forward that we have.

I think that if we were to perservere with him, get him fit and develop his attributes, albeit raw ones, I think he could turn out to be a decent signing.

Anybody comparing him with big hutch is just taking the pi$$.

Spot on, age, ability and desire are the 3 big differences!

Exactly.

We have props who do 60 minutes for the reserves but in the championship are blowing after 20.

Nowhere near the same pace.

I really cant see everybody's problem. The bloke obviously wants to play and always gives it his all. I would be dissapointed not to offer him a contract. The problem with him does not lie with him. If somebody wont let him play its not his fault. Made more yards than King imo

100% agree

I'll second that

of course they will be but an impact prop will only play 2 15-20 min spells in any normal team.

if he came on with 15-20 mins gone went off just before halftime then came back on after 10-15 mins of second half gone for another 20 mins Moa wouldn't look out of place