And why shouldn't they be after the drivel they printed today/everyday. We don't need a red rag as our media outlet after all we have our famous east Hull correspondent to do that!

Is this directly because of today's article? The one were James Smales said exactly what we've all been thinking and saying on here about Mr. Rule!!

After all the kak that was printed about Rovers pre season 'financial' issues and the Ben Cockayne stuff if FC had suffered similar than Uncle Kath and puppet Rule would never talk to the press again...

... the articles today scratched the surface.... sorry but the club is gone until you sort out Kath & Rule and I'm sure you can.... nobody is bigger than the club

didn't see anything wrong with today's coverage...apart from perhaps trying to claim Crocker/Lakuaki was a HullFC 'mistake'

what exactly do the board expect them to write after such a face over Reardon and 6 defeats in a row?

Exactly

Fricking joke. Hull FC are just a bunch of tossas from top to bottom. Every one of the ham shankers deserves to be shot!

If it's true then the club have sunk further than I thought possible. Censorship of the press? Sounds like something stalin or hitler would do to keep the bad publicity from surfacing. Laughable

Pretty much how I read it also.

If this [iis[/i the sole reason for the ban, then someone needs to get a grip. Frankly the club should have a thicker skin - it's only a local rag trying to raise it's circulation FFS.

won't make much difference its just all about city nowadays anyway

[url=http://www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league/hull_fc/news/displayarticle.php?ID=12371Someone had better tell Rich Agar then.[/url

I could be wrong but think they have a ore match press conference earlier on the week were all the media are there. The ban will probably be 1 on 1 interviews.

I'm getting more and more fed up with the club each day. We are the laughing stock of rugby league at the minute and cutting links with the 2 biggest media links in the city won't help change that.

My dad likes to