I am probably among the small percentage of FC fans who are happy for Rovers to do well as long as FC do better and we win when we play Rovers . Watching Rovers V Leeds on SKY last friday I wanted Rovers to win and felt the video ref bottled it when he should have gone for benefit of doubt and given the try ( it would have been a try had it been a Leeds try decision I bet ) , so CHEW on that . Oh are you American because in Engl**d it is called association football .

As Chairman of SMC he has been negligent in two of his duties, to maximise income for the stadium and to allow the stadium to be used by the whole community not just football fans. The decision was made with his Hull City hat on and if he is now sticking by the decision we are never going to get an RL international at the KC again because they are always sorted well before football fixtures come out.
This ludicrous situation of being chairman of both Hull City and SMC needs addressing because there is a clear conflict of interests

You wanted BOD when the ball was clearly knocked forward? How odd.




Actually, soccer is just a contraction of 'association football' and is in common use on both sides of the Atlantic.

I reckon you are

Wash your mouth out

i didnt jump in when i heard about this ,i thought the RFL may be partly to blame but listening to duffen i think he is bang out of order ,and he has cost the city thousands of pounds ,hotels ,bars cafes, restraunts ,the stadium itself ,at a time we should be attracting biss to the city ,other major city in the uk are actually bidding to get rugby leauge to there venues ,this clown turns them away ,the coucil must be livid ,they spend millions getting the city a venue to host major avents and then due to some tin pot football chairman who hasnt put a penny in the stadium pot find them selfs losing out ,in a resession turning a major event away ,just hope this doesnt do any long lasting damage to our chances in the future ,but i wouldnt be supprised if it does tbh ,the rfl may not come back now ,just hope the coucil turn to the lawers to look at this SMC agreement and find a way of taking back control of our stadium ,really p*ssed off as a rugby supporter and a coucil tax payer of hull

That's the longest sentence I've ever read. Full stop anyone?

thanx for your contribution.

You're welcome. Problem with a post like that is it's very difficult to read, you get half way through and give up because it hurts your eyes.

like i said thanks for adding to the topic craig,next time your teaching an english class ill see if im off work .

Some posters on here have a twisted sense of logic and a problem reading beyond a posters name.

I suggested instead of whining like scelped puppies, you wait for the facts, but no, you prefer to jump to conclusions.



Now, the decision aside as I've commented on that, some claim this is a rugby mad city, fine, have the game here, it'll sell out to locals therefore no extra income to this area.

Have the game just an hour down the road (hardly a problem to rugby mad types) more people can see it live and others can watch in pubs and clubs bringing income to local businesses.

You should be praising Mr Duffens business sense and consideration to local trade and RL fans as well as counting your blessings that Hull FC's board have turned down every opportunity they've had to be more involved with the SMC. What a mess they'd have made of things if you lot are an example of the small minded RL attitudes. After all, if they'd had their way, this question would never have arisen as they wanted an even smaller ground whereas football requested a bigger one.

We actually got turned down for one of the minor football Internationals for similar reasons too in the past, but I doubt you'd like to hear that as it screws up your opportunity to blaim football for your problems.