Well Pearson would say that wouldn't he? He's hardly going to point the finger at anyone thats still at the club. From what I hear Agar was a victim off events at Hull. No doubt like all blinkered fans you’ll just believe what you want to believe.

He said he had the phone records/recordings to prove it.We hull fans are happy to have a genuine owner in Pearson after these years of kath and her son-in-law,and his honesty in berating kath and her dishonesty.look back on our board and see the amount of ''agar out'' threads and you will realise we have wanted rid of you're new head coach since 2009!! Hardly sourgrapes.

I do believe the forum was recorded and is on our official website to listen to what Pearson had to say about Kath and Agar.

Maybe Agar was giving a young kid good advice, to get out of a badly-run club? He was probably planning the same exit himself.

I'd have thought it was a bit soon to say what kind of owner you have yet. If this guy doesn't achieve success that the fans demand, along with the newly appointed coach, the fans will quickly turn.
Seems to have got the Hull fans on side fairly easily by slagging off the last regime and owner.

Aside from all the other drivel you post, are you seriously suggesting that Leeds are one of your main rivals?

Delusions of grandeur over 'Ull way, without a doubt.

Dearie me

Lets see what happens on the pitch under your new regime so far your not pulling up any trees I can see in signings etc.

Regardless of who is to blame Hull are certainly in the limelight for all the wrong reasons at the moment we will see how the new owner etc handles the situation, I have to say your coach and bomber dont inspire me wuth confidence and as for pearson we will se seems the deal but lets wait and see how it pans out.

Is this the same genuine owner who,despite newspaper reports,rumour and speculation about Richard Agar going to Wakefield Trinity Wildcats,gave a lengthy denial ?
Is your criticism of Kath the same Kath who was with Shaun McRae at Gateshead Thunder before Hull took the club over ? Did she learn to select a side while McRae was the head coach at both clubs ?
Did Kath recommend Mcrae to Pearson or did he just pick him from a hat,bearing in mind he was initially 'on the sick' at Salford ?

PS - Where was the bugging device positioned for you to hear how Kath ordered Richard Agar to select a certain player ? Alternatively,did you secrete your five bellies in the boardroom or elsewhere ;there could be even more juicy rumours from you ? Alas,none of them anywhere near believable.

McCrae left hull at a time when he didn't really want to but felt he had no choice.Certainly happy to return once kath left

You're wasting your time - a small contingent of the Hull faithful, who've cultivated a rather odd and certainly unfounded sense of entitlement (based on the belief that they are a 'big' club) will lay the blame for years of underachievement at whomever's doorstep is most convenient; it's been Agar for a number of years, now it's Uncle Kath and I'm sure that this time next year, it'll be Gentle, his bezzy mate Bomber, or their shared agent, who've engineered a rather comprehensive takeover at the club.

Interestingly, if the reported Premiership ruling regards shared stadiums was to ever be sanctioned and come into force, Mr Pearson has manouvered himself into a position where he could remove Hull FC from the KC by accepting a compromise deal to play elsewhere on their behalf.

I've had the pleasure of meeting Pearson on a couple of occasions, granted it was a while ago when he was at Leeds Utd, and while he seems to be a decent fella he was never interested in Rugby League at all! It surprised me when I heard he'd bought into Hull FC because he was adamant all those years ago that he he wasn't interested in any other sports.

Maybe there's an element of pre planning and positioning going on in readiness for a Premiership ruling?

neither was Glover,but just like you're owner Mrs Pearson and their 2 daughters are hugely into RL.

All hearsay,which will never come to fruition.This all stems from the pitch at the DW stadium,but the pitch at the kc is always top standard.Why would it affect us at the kc? Hull city don't own it no more than we do.Both clubs pay an even rent to the ''council'' owned stadium.Mr Allam,city's owner did want the stadium,but wanted it for free,so he could finance against it to build on,for which the council sent him packing.I doubt the stadium will ever be sold at any time due to it being paid for by hull peoples money (kc shares issue).

The DW is owned by Whelan,unlike the kc,which is owned by the local authority

But that doesn't stop Pearson, acting as soccer boss, from formulating an offer to the Rugby League club which would see them receive a cash offer to move out and then Pearson, acting as Rugby boss, accepting his own offer and Hull FC vacating the KC.

Strange and unethical but we've certainly seen similar things happen in sport, Rugby League, even at Wakefield and even at Hull FC. Look at the wrangle going on at the Galpharm with respect to Davy's strange Aquisition of Huddersfield Towns shareholding of the stadium.

Never underestimate the power of money on the decision making of an individual.

It may be hearsay but it's an issue that keeps coming back up time after time after time!

There's no doubt whatsoever that soccer bosses would love to have soccer stadiums with no one else, no other sport being payed there. There's equally no doubt that the FA Premier league will one day, sooner or later, pass legislation that their clubs must play in soccer stadiums and no other sports are to use their facilities.

If Hull City were to win promotion under such legislation do you really think that Pearson would turn down the £millions they'd earn just to keep the FC faithfull happy?

Of course he wouldn't and he's cleverly put himself into a situation where he would/could make all the important decisions regarding the offer and acceptance of a deal which would see FC vacate the KC.