Enlighten me.

Forget it Alf, I thought you were well informed and would know which developments I'm referring to.

Yeah, it's only a trifling £15 million quid - forget it!

I take it your condemnation extends to all those who regularly attack the people of castleford too. It's just that you seem to have forgotten to quote the hundreds of posts from wakefield fans where they have made cruel and childish remarks and chosen to respond to one of the few posts where a castleford retaliates with a like for like comment.

I do. As far as I'm aware the Stadium is the core part of the development, without which it won't go ahead!

You need to understand, there is no connection between Yorkcourt and the club. The Staddium is being built for the trust who again have no connection with the club as a business. We will just be tenants, we won't own it though we may operate it. Yorkcourt should they get past the PI and are still wanting to go with the development will build the stadium as planned regardless of Wakefields current plight.

I know it sounds odd but that is how these things work.

The revised Travel Plan is something that should have been dealt with at the original submission. It is only one part of the Inquiry terms of reference.

I doubt that the fact that Leeds City Region ( A partnership bringing together the eleven local authorities of Barnsley, Bradford, Calderdale, Craven, Harrogate, Kirklees, Leeds, Selby, Wakefield, York and North Yorkshire County Council) announcing that “Aire Valley” ( Stourton) is their preferred location for the Enterprise Zone will have much bearing on the Leeds City Council submission to PI.

- It could even bolster the position of Leeds City Council who will want to attract as much development to that area rather than seeing it lost to NM.

So, enlighten me as to any other "developments".

Thats par for the course for some of the Cas posters that contribute to the Wakey forum. They come on here as the epitome of moderation then go and spout their real feelings trying to whip up anti-wakey trash talk on the other scumbag forum they post on.

Indeed they do and Fully is one of the prime movers; his perfidiousness has been exposed several times recently by myself, G Price FC and others and as a result, he has zero credibility.

Every cloud has a silver lining though - since his multiple personalities were revealed, he posts here far less often, which is a boon.

And yet your immaturity still knows no bounds.

You've exposed nothing; only what you like to believe and more often than not construed to support your own bitter, twisted, boring arguments.

Quite possibly but it has been dealt with now and two statutory objections have been removed by resolution. These things do take time as you know... so, how are Opus getting on with the Travel Plan for Tesco on Wheldon Road? The application goes in, in just a few weeks does it not? Do you think there travel plan will be 'dealt with' prior to submission?



Well you know what thinking does for you mate... you still think that Wheldon Road has not been allocated for housing in the LDF, despite it being in black and white in the housing land supply table of the site specific LDF document. Yes, it was indeed removed as a specific housing site (as Cas and Ben Bailey originally wanted!) in favour of the whole Wheldon Road area been given SPA status but if you look in the table, right there in the housing section under 'Housing Land Supply' it says - SPA N9; Site Name, N101 Castleford Tigers Ground, Wheldon Road; Total Identified Housing Capacity, 105; 2008/09 to 2015/16, 21; 2016/17 to 2021/22, 84.

Don't forget this bit either - "The special policy areas will help meet the requirements for both housing and employment land, as shown in the housing land supply table in chapter 6, Housing Proposals and the employment land supply in chapter 7, Employment Proposals."

You are right, an SPA gives more flexibility to move this allocation elsewhere within the SPA, so where do you suggest they build those 105 houses instead then? Don't ask Nestle and Aeternum Capital for it to be moved to their sites because they are very likley to be leading the objections to the supermarket application... because they both want a Supermarket as well... and to be honest, I feel Aeternum Capital might have a very good case!



I feel that the days for enlightening you about anything to do with Newmarket are long gone... you have shown your true colours recently (which is a shame, because I thought you where above them) and it resides with the small 'hypocrites are us' bunch of Cas supporters who only see flaws in the Newmarket plan (which is far from perfect, but as you know I feel the positives outweigh the negatives reasonably substantially) but think that the Opus plan for Wheldon Road is perfect in every detail (despite having not actually seen it yet) and without any problems or issues at all... if only development and regeneration was that simple!

You are priceless Fully, you really are... lets looks at what you say here eh - rlhttp://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f... and you don't consider this even slightly bitter and twisted, despite everything and Cas almost certainly (and rightly so) being in SL next year?

As for what you like to believe, well I KNOW you only choose to believe what you want to believe while you are quite happy to ignore any information, no matter how black and white, that contradicts this belief in any way... never mind being a journalist... you should join a cult... you would be a perfect member of any cult!