Liam finn?

When are we likely to announce it michael?

I'm thinking it will be someone not mentioned yet on here, as no one is really in the know. Someone wanting a break and willing to give it 100% for the opportunity. I'm not expecting craig gower or someone else with years of experience at the top or middle

I thought it was pretty obvious I said that's what he was on ,not what he'd been offered but eh its hard work sometimes

Not bad offer then with a 7k increase plus add ons on a 1 year deal for one notable game in the red,white and blue? If he'd performed well probably it would have been reviewed as in the SL shop window and a improved deal may have come?.....

If I was to hazard a guess the new scrum half .....Liam Finn would be likely with an opportunity to play at Super League on a 1 year contract and good luck to him if that's the case.

Thursday all being well

Cheers

I was just reading cooper cronk's twitter page, and he gives no indication of an announcment on Thursday... I am confused.

Bet he is samoan Ned

Our last Cooper was Gary, but we've had dozens of Cronks.

Well the 15k with benefits is far from what was has been mentioned before I still think it's still shy of being the complete package to encourage a player to knuckle down and work harder if there's other clubs willing to dangle a carrot.

On today's ideals most employers are looking for that bit extra and when players (Mellers for instance) just turn up and under perform it grates on the fans to see money just being wasted, why can't players be on a fixed pay with the old fashioned win/lose bonus, what was wrong with that system. Can anyone enlighten why we should pay to see under performance games surely in incentive to win would build that pay packet that they want

Hard to get a mortgage etc when all your money is in win bonus, and you get nothing in off season.
Reason it worked in the old days was that most were part time and had a different regular income.

so rent and play to win, easy isn't it

I think the big point is being missed here. We offerred as much as we could afford!! And we weren't prepared to go any higher. The same happened with Jamie Langley. We lost out on him salary wise for 2k. But it was 2k too much.