In your opinion it’s Pitts best position but for many of us he moved beyond that last year. When he did play LF he was our best back rower by some imo, he’d be wasted in the SR now, especially as we have plenty of options.

None of those you’ve mentioned are LF’s as there best position, Crowther isn’t there yet, Walker is too slight, Arona is now far to slow, O’Donovan to young, Sid is utility and I know where you’ve got the idea that Whitbread is a LF, but he’s been signed as a prop, his best position to use your logic. I can’t find any evidence of him playing LF despite what wiki says.

If you don’t want to take my word for it that’s fine but you’re pushing it when it’s what the coaching staff think. No offence but if they say he’s a LF then he is, what you and I say is irrelevant.

I'm not sure they have said Pitts is a LF have they?
I really think Pitts would be good but a good SR doesn't just evolve into a good LF.
I think Bateman has been hindered by playing 13 as an example.

Pitts almost exclusively played right second row to my knowledge last year and the year before. I don’t see how performing as excellent as he did on the right SR why he would all of a sudden become wasted in that same position in 2022. I’m not saying he wouldn’t become a good LF but he’s already an excellent right SR as proved by his performances there last year.

As for those i mentioned for LF I agree they aren’t ready but they’re at an age where the only thing that will get them ready is game time. Crowther and Walker are the two I am looking at here. At their age they either start getting the game time or they will be quickly heading back to the lower leagues.

How do I know or you what the coaching staff think? I’m not privy to that and it’s just my opinion.

Pitts has barely if at all played at LF and has excelled last season at right SR. Tangi was largely ineffective most of the season at prop and right SR. Willie moved him to left SR and we had the Tanginoa playing out of his skin again. I just can’t see much sense in taking two players in their most experienced positions (where they have performed best) and moving them.

I hope I am proved wrong if Pitts is moved to 13 and Tangi to other side of the field I really do. I want the players and club to succeed and I will support them but I see these player movements (if they are to happen) as a risk.

I am sure I read somewhere that we were thinking of playing Lee Gaskell at LF.

Everything I've read from WP is that he's covering the backs, FB and So especially.
I'm sure he could cover LF but he isn't the season option.

Ideally for me, Tanginoa on the left, Pitts on the right and Willie teaches Crowther how to run with impact and he gets the 13. If Ashurst is coming back to his best I'm ok with him starting and Tanginoa coming on for impact.

Crowther lacks any perceivable passing game which a modern day LF needs.

I wouldn’t be against him playing there but maybe not from the start of the games, but moving into 13 as the initial heat has gone out of the game.

I did suggest this would be the plan behind signing him, but when Milky was linked with a move away I thought he would be a direct replacement for him but obviously that never happened.

I think the intensity at the start of a match would be too much for him however once the game opens up I can see him moving there to play as the extra pivot as the game opens up.

I think he is an astute signing who probably due to his ability to play in so many positions across the backline and as the ball handling 13 now he is reaching the matter end of his career.

I think it was mentioned by one of the former coaches that he could slip in there.

To be fair the game is very different now to how it used to be played; forwards were forwards and backs were back -rarely did you see a SR forward on the field not packing down. That;s not the case now though, we see FB's packing down and sometimes it seems the first six there pack down! The LF of spends as much time it seems, out of the pack as in it!

Tough season to come can we finish above Toulouse Huddersfield Hull KR Salford?
Salford have recruited well as have Hull KR.
No doubt we will upset one or two of the big boys but to survive wins have to come v these four.
10th is my bet.

Depending on who stays fit i will go with 8th but would love 7th improvement over last few seasons.

Happy New Year, Cheshire !

Hope you're right, pal.

Really? It's odd how we all see things differently,
I think Crowther has a fair passing game, but the ball playing loose forwards which you say the modern game needs, barely exist IMO.
Joe Westerman came close but he was no Steve Norton, nor even close to LF's of that quality.
I've said earlier I wish we had a good ball playing LF, but because of the scrum structures as they are such a player is not essential.

Let's be clear about a LH passing game.
It isn't the ability to pass the ball we need. We have loads of players who can do that.
It's the ability to run at the line and put doubt in the oppositions mind whether you will pass or run, and if you choose to, put a pass in that hits the right player.
That requires a forward with a running game. That's what Crowther needs to improve. He has the hands.

I agree. What people have done is view Crowthers passing game when he played a few games at hooker. For a hooker, his passing game or distribution was not up to scratch but for a modern LF, he's ok if not the best.

A good squad player at the moment, but if he continues to mature as he has then I do see him in the long term as a LF and I think he'll be a good 'un .