No he is not allowed to play.

Crap signing not fit ,not played for a year ,no

Given his lack of match fitness and also the fact that his position is the one that is our strongest, I am disappointed with this one TBH.

Dont get me wrong he is a good player and would br a good signing if we were short of back rowers.

To me it is a waste and would have been better with a prop or half back/hooker

I am sorry but if not fit for 5 weeks then it is a pointless signing, slightly more chance to play than Grix but not much. I will let others explain if they can what we benefit from it Cox would have been understandable but not this.

The club surely wouldn't loan a player that still isn't fit for 5 weeks. If true it's one of the barmier things we've done.

We took one last season who was never going to play.

The Warrington forum members don't understand why we would sign him because the club have not indicated he is ready to return. I suppose we will receive some sort of explanation but on the face of it not the signing we were looking for to strengthen the squad.

Yes I'm interested to hear what the club have to say about this.

Seems bizarre. Can only think it's a signing for next season.

Ben's just tweeted this though.

I notice that three people asked him if he was fit to play, they are still waiting a reply.

Don't really see the point in signing Harrison, a guy thay hasn't played all year, whilst having Yates and Walker out on loan. Would have rather trusted the guys that were already part of the squad.