If he has done the dirty on us he should be barred for life.

Hmm, if true, I wonder when he acquired these shares? Perhaps around the time Newcold was permitted outside of the S106???

We could discuss this subject for twenty more years and it's doubtful that the real truth will ever come out. The "Establishment" will only ever let you know what they want you to know irrespective of any legal obligations to be open. it would seem obvious now that WMDC, Yorkcourt , RMW or whoever don't want you to know the truth. Somewhere along the line someones's pockets are heavier than they were, and Trinity supporters together with the citizens of WMD are somewhat poorer for that. We have lost out big time and they don't give a fig.

No idea mate, I'd assume the info is out there, if so, name and shame! You asked the question, where did you get that rumour from?

Wouldn't that be a conflict of interest? And if so he should be brought to task, if not illegal he should be outed for his involvement, maybe the Wakey express would get involved then, or even bigger news outlets?

Just seen that Walker has resigned with immediate effect, strange timing

The plot thickens.

Don't understand what's going on to be honest. I thought all along Rodney was on the board at Yorkcourt. In what way has he done the dirty. Explain.

Just a mate down the pub mate.Dont know if there is any truth in it ,That's why I made it a question and not a statment

Ok AKA, just wondered.

Never heard that one before.

He's not named as being on their board, officially at least.

Surly if rw is on the board he'd have wanted the community stadium to go head asap , what the hells going on ?

if he's on the board (or owns shares) in a company which will have to build a £15m stadium for next to no return, I'm sure he'd be looking for any way possible to avoid building a stadium which will eat into his personal profit.

The plot thickens...

If RW was on the board, or had any financial interest in YCP, surely he would have declared that to the Trust when he was being considered as Chair, so they could make an informed decision about any potential conflict of interest?