You can spin it however you want mate, the guys dropped a right bollock with this and imo he knew full well of the implications of what he was doing.

He's done nothing wrong at all.

He was asked to confirm the story about the feasibility study and if Wakefield would be able to share at Glasshoughton, he confirmed both of these that's that.

Massive over reaction by the Wakefield fans on this and you're trying to turn nothing into something for no reason at all.



No he hasn't, he was asked to provide facts he gave facts. There is no implications either - as someone else said it will have no effect on the outcome.

If Newmarket does not pass, it isn't because of RW it's because the project wasn't feasible or legal under planning guidelines.

If they had a legal team, he wouldn't have said what he said.

I haven't read anything that could be seen as a legal issue. No one has accused him of doing anything apart from supporting the objections for our new stadium. All people are saying is that we don't see why he needs to be involved and by getting involved he is picking the opposite side to us, which we don't think is appropriate for the Chairman of Cas.
He is starting a war (of words) that really would have been better left alone.
Even if his letter has no effect, no one will forget this and it will be an issue at every Cas/Wakefield game from now on and he'll probably find ill advised supporters of Wakefield trying their best to derail the Cas plans in retaliation.
He would have been better just saying nothing.....but he chose not to.

When was the green light given for the Glasshoughtin build to commence. I seem to have missed that 1.

.....and to be honest, if his letter made a difference, and we lost the chance of this stadium......is anyone at Wakefield likely to support a move to Glasshoughton now?
Think the other choices would be used first.

A sad and desperate act from a sad and desperate little man.

Are Cas not currently against a development gaining a renewal on its planning permission in Cas town cente and are currently having fans object against it as it could well scupper their chances of a supermarket ever been built on WR. Maybe we should all write in support of the development. Eye for an eye and all that. Thats how petty and pathetic this has become.

You could always share with Rovers

No, HTH.

People of the town and Tescos have objected to the plans by Edinburgh house because they are both unfeasible (Tesco outline why) and would get rid of much needed town centre parking to accommodate for a Supermarket that no operator wants to use due to its size and location.

The club have nothing to do with those objections.

It's only become silly and pathetic too because you're blindly following the words of SWAG etc when in fact if you look at it clearly, RW only replied with facts that have been in the public domain for over a year, you're using this because you have nothing else to use.

As anyone got the actual wording of this letter.

I havent seen anything yet in reguards the wording.

So until i do i'll hold fire on condeming anyone.

A very sensible reply! I do hope Gronk reads this, as he seems to know everything and everyone

RW didn't makes comments in the press a couple of weeks ago against the EH development then? Sounding very much like a thinly veiled rallying call to me.

RW should have declined to comment about the development plans of a fellow RL club, end of.