Did he? I know his father Martin Richardson did time for involvement with a shooting at Trotters bar on York road donkeys years since, he had a neck like a rhino, just saying.

I'm sure I and many morewould be even more pist-off than Jowitt himself if that was to happen

Didn't think it was so long ago that Bailey had his indiscretion.
Was sure there was one after that.
Looks like I was incorrect.

Me too, but realistically I think Grix is here as very good cover for 1-7, nothing more, nice position to be in though!

Jowitt to start at FB with the use of Grix allowing opportunities for him to take a rest during the season. Whilst not a first choice in any position, Grix will get plenty of game time given his versatility.

Yes I know, I was confirming what Vasty said.

My point is, your safeguarding policies are contained to your working environment,other environments contain different policies.You don't write policies,you add to the standard format in a way your company deals with whats contained within that standard.

Just because a policy doesn't exist in your environment,doesn't mean it does not exist in another.

Where does he say otherwise and what's it got to do with Moore.

Try reading the thread..And I'll gladly answer your question?

Think Jowitt will play less games then the past season, we seemed to have over played him and I believe he was carrying a shoulder injury? Remember listening/reading an interview from the club - cant remember which one though. If Max plays half the games of the season I think that is a good target for himself imo

Wakey don't have to suspend Moore at all. He's not convicted of anything and they could quite happily play him up until his trial date.

If he is convicted, the club can decide whether to dismiss him or not. They could just as easily stand by him, on the basis that it had nothing to do with rugby.

Or they could dismiss him on the grounds it brought the club into disrepute, or because there could be an outcome that prevented him from travelling to training.

In essence, they can do what they want before the trial and after the trial, and they will do whatever suits. There have been players who've transgressed and been kept on by their clubs because they are valued, and there have been players moved on for similar transgressions.

What might be uppermost in the club's mind is that they want a settled team rotation and a known playing budget. To suggest the club has to do any particular thing is nonsense.