Kyle Eastmond won't be going anywhere now, Jonny Lomax with a potentially long term ankle injury.

Yes, but if he has already signed for us for the rest of the season (which some are saying is the case), then it's too late for you unless you have some recall clause in the deal.

not for me this one, why risk the team spirit which is doing things none of us expected??

we have 4 wins and we beat cas away, why bring in a sulking "superstar"??

true if was going to be Eastmond but Summut could boost the team better than him, for all NGB4C's enthusiastic posts about finishing in the top 8 our only aim for this season will be a rip roaring trip through the cup rounds with the luck of the draw again

he's the better rumour of the two, not hitting it off with Harris at the mo by all accounts

also Kyle not turning up for training phoning in sick whats chances he turns up for us not realistic is it

off the saints forum
now Lomax is injured they will need Eastmond but is still 'touch and go'

So rumour then.

I'd much rather have Sammut than Eastmond - I've been talking about him for ages and distinctly remember lamenting the fact that we weren't in for him last season, when he appeared at Crusaders shortly after we'd offloaded Brough, effectively ending our season. He's a cracking player and would almost certainly become a crowd favourite at BV.

When are we likely to hear something official?

Soon?

Eastmond hasn't signed anything, just heard that from somebody at the club. They don't think Wakefield even approached him.