For most it's pure frustration only a few are being genuinely vindictive.

I don't think it needs to become a them and us not that I'm suggesting that's what you are doing

I back all you say. I know it's hard but try not to confuse genuine concerns with plain moaning if you can.

Might add that IMHO the club and the fans probably owe you money probably a considerable amount - what you've spent on paper alone could fuel a small town.

There may not be vitriol as such, just "oh yeah no news", yawn emojis, "yeah of course you can't tell us, that sort of smug attitude.I've had one or two pops aimed at me from people who should know better but I chose not to bite. As I've said before, ten years since I went to what would eventually become a SWAG meeting, maybe ten people, yes TEN people in attendance, out of that four got involved with SWAG, a fifth joined a few weeks later. It's a pity the keyboard warriors snidely having a pop at TRB weren't brave enough to step forward then.

From the correspondance published regarding the letter of Joanne Roaney it specifically states the CHAIRMAN OF THE TRUST was present and agreed to this damaging planning condition. The chairman at that time was Sir Rodney Walker !!!!!!!!!

Phil and the rest were lead up the garden path and it was agreed without their knowledge and they were not consulted. I am sure if Phil had known he would not have agreed.

Looks like poor old Phil has not only had to fight the council and developer but has also had to overcome problems within the trust itself.

Nevertheless, its now history as they say. But I would still like to know why such a massive favour was granted to the developer and nothing was gained in return.

Just had my usual daily visit to the nutjob forum and although it can be highly controversial , facts can often be found amongst the 'other stuff'

They have a different take on the ground situation and are suggesting we have not realised where the real problem is.

Elaborate, by PM if you can't post please.

I think most people appreciate everyone's efforts. It has not been a straightforward priblem we have faced.

The silence both officially and unofficially from RMW is deafening. I was at the "Hearing" when RMW was giving evidence and amongst the self-promoting accolades he was pouring upon himself, he claimed that he was instrumental in the provision of the new National Stadium at Wembley. Perhaps a small community stadium in a West Yorkshire backwater didn't carry enough prestige for him.

Wasn't it rodders who went running to the Wakey express about the revamped belle vue option when he shouldn't have?

Nailed it. Beware the wolf in sheeps clothing.

Tried your damnedest .That's what they say when you've lost ?.

That's what I was alluding to, without making a direct allegation; I simply can't believe, for a second, that RW wasn't aware of the consequences of allowing the Newcold application to be submitted separately and outside the 106 agreement.

The question then is why he would allow that - what was his interest...?

Is it true that Rodney walker has shares in yorkcourt or what ever they call them ?????

Saw him quite regularly on paragon business park, I hoped he was helping secure the community stadium.