Lets assume what you've heard is accurate, which part isn't going to happen? The stadium or the whole development? It's not inconceivable that a lack of funds would derail the stadium aspect, but without that the rest of the scheme can not go ahead.

like wakey have 5 mil for a new stand, get real, TRB come on

I was once sent for a long stand in my first job as a snotty nosed 15 year old.

Is it inconceivable that (and i'd just like to point out i won't buy int this rumour until i see it or here it from a trusted source, no offence Dave) the development company could give us some dosh (say half of the build costs) to buy back the ground (B.V) and redevelop it (or part of it) and save themselves the hassle and the remaining half of the building costs tied up in the new stadium, or would the 106 agreement (or whatever bit of legislation is involved) forbid that.
I WILL REITERATE, THIS IS MY MIND GOING OFF ON A WANDER ALL OF ITS OWN AND NOT BASED ON ANY FACT OR RUMOUR!!!

no I'd magine they haven't. although perhaps they've made alternative arrangements witht he developers??? that's a pure guess though.

I hope I've been misinformed, and as yet credit to you guys for not boarding the "cas fan peddling crap" ship, but thus far I've been informed correctly on other aspects of the development - not that I've made it my business to know.

The whole development has been de-railed I was told by my rather upset informant.

I assume before laying out such a significant sum of money the club will likely have bought BV back too?!

One thing  I would say, if the NM scheme falls flat on its backside I think the club should get in touch with the guys who are working on the City Fields development and see if they can take up the site where the proposed warehouse are set to go at the old Power Station site. It would work well with the proposed relief road that will be built there and may help push that massive development through PP. It means starting right at the very beginning but it could be a more suitable site (not as far OOT).

Wouldn't assume you'd believe it before an announcement is official anyway Kinley, no offence taken mate.

And you're thinking along the same lines as me by the looks of things

If the whole scheme has been derailed there will be no money to come from it.

part of this rumour I wish could be true staying at belle vue and having a new stadium build but how would this be financed, its not just parking facilities that let the old girl down

don't take this as red guys, obviously. I wouldn't say it if I was unsure of it's validity though for obvious reasons

Really - we will see.

Interesting, as we don't own the ground I'd be amazed if we were eyeing up a new programme shed

nail on the head really, we will see. I hope I'm wrong like, though even then I'd still say it's bloody years away, but that's irrelevant

Plausible just I suppose. However we'd need the ground back so add another 2m on that make it 7m or 3.5m each. I can see that suiting Yorkcourt but where will we get 3.5m from?

there must be some sort of contingency plan