The letter looks to be genuine but, as yet, I personally haven't received it via e-mail although it may have come in the post this morning but that generally comes after I leave home. This is what happened last time but the e-mail also came through the same morning.

I am ever more convinced that Townvilletiger is Mr Cubbage who spoke at the Inquiry and had his evidence dismissed by the Inspector. Whom ever the poster is, they clearly either spoke at the inquiry or are close to someone who did if they have got hold of this letter/e-mail. As there were not that many of them, then it is my guess it is probably Mr Cubbage. I do think whomever Townvilletiger is, they should stop being a coward and stop hiding behind a username and come clean about who they really are! They are continuing to make personal & untrue allegations about me and questioning my motives and character without any evidence or foundation. My identity is common knowledge and if they have a problem with me they should have the balls to come out and (metaphorically) put these allegations to me directly. Can someone post this on Cas Forum for me please and tell Townvilletiger to reveal their true identity to me via the Residents for Newmarket E-mail (residentsfornewmarket@gmail.com) address and I will be happy to meet them face to face.

We were told exactly what I posted, that all documentation has been submitted to the SoS to deadline. I think we need to be a little careful here, because we never asked directly if the section 106 had been submitted signed or either told directly that it had. I actually expected that they would have submitted all their paperwork, which they said they did, and that would have included their proposed section 106 document for discussion and then further discussions will have taken place between the SoS officers and Yorkcourt to get the agreement signed and finalised prior to 13th September. It would appear that a section 106 has not yet been finalised and signed, but equally the SoS office clearly expecting that it will be resolved, otherwise they would have just pulled the plug on the planning.

We will now make some enquires and ask Yorkcourt if they are willing to share with us their side of the story and let us have some more information about why they have been unable to agree and sign a section 106 agreement to date. I am sure that there are very good and clear reasons this hasn't been sorted yet and hope they are able to share the reasons with us.

I am not overly worried at this stage because it would appear the SoS officers are expecting this to be resolved and there could be a million reasons it hasn't.

Yorkcourt have spent a fair sum of money to get to this stage and I don't think they are going to fall at the last hurdle.

The letter looks to be genuine but, as yet, I personally haven't received it via e-mail although it may have come in the post this morning but that generally comes after I leave home. This is what happened last time but the e-mail also came through the same morning.

I am ever more convinced that Townvilletiger is Mr Cubbage who spoke at the Inquiry and had his evidence dismissed by the Inspector. Whom ever the poster is, they clearly either spoke at the inquiry or are close to someone who did if they have got hold of this letter/e-mail. As there were not that many of them, then it is my guess it is probably Mr Cubbage. I do think whomever Townvilletiger is, they should stop being a coward and stop hiding behind a username and come clean about who they really are! They are continuing to make personal & untrue allegations about me and questioning my motives and character without any evidence or foundation. My identity is common knowledge and if they have a problem with me they should have the balls to come out and (metaphorically) put these allegations to me directly. Can someone post this on Cas Forum for me please and tell Townvilletiger to reveal their true identity to me via the Residents for Newmarket E-mail (residentsfornewmarket@gmail.com) address and I will be happy to meet them face to face.

We were told exactly what I posted, that all documentation has been submitted to the SoS to deadline. I think we need to be a little careful here, because we never asked directly if the section 106 had been submitted signed or either told directly that it had. I actually expected that they would have submitted all their paperwork, which they said they did, and that would have included their proposed section 106 document for discussion and then further discussions will have taken place between the SoS officers and Yorkcourt to get the agreement signed and finalised prior to 13th September. It would appear that a section 106 has not yet been finalised and signed, but equally the SoS office clearly expecting that it will be resolved, otherwise they would have just pulled the plug on the planning.

We will now make some enquires and ask Yorkcourt if they are willing to share with us their side of the story and let us have some more information about why they have been unable to agree and sign a section 106 agreement to date. I am sure that there are very good and clear reasons this hasn't been sorted yet and hope they are able to share the reasons with us.

I am not overly worried at this stage because it would appear the SoS officers are expecting this to be resolved and there could be a million reasons it hasn't.

Yorkcourt have spent a fair sum of money to get to this stage and I don't think they are going to fall at the last hurdle.