This.

We're all Wakey aren't we?

Is it me?

I just don't get this.

We have played three of the most beatable teams we will face this season and lost to all three.

Yes Salford was close, but no cigar.

Bradford was a bad loss.

But Wigan was the worst for me. You can never call any Wigan team poor, but they will not put a more inexperienced and beatable team out this season but we never came close. Didn't really expect a win but there were 20 points separating us.

So if we can't run that Wigan team close what makes you think we will get close enough to any SL teams to beat them within the remainder of the season - I can't see it. Bradford are already just 2 points behind us and London look no worse than us. - I respect you as a poster Slugger but I find the comments you and others make a little complacent - as I say it could be me.

For me we could come out of the Easter games more or less relegated let alone in better shape.

That's because their teams are playing well per at least to potential, what would you expect.

As for nasty comments that rarely affects players and was as rife in 2004, 2008 and 2012 when we were quite good.

I agree with all your assessments there.
The difficulty is, that 4 wins possible does not mean 4 wins minimum/expeceted as some people read it.
I'm feeling positive about Catalan, London Hull KR and Cas but if we only get 4 points across that group it isn't the end of the world and it doesn't mean we are going down.
JK used to group the season in to 4 groups and planned resource and long term plan appropriately.
The end of the first period would be Hull KR in this fixture list. So first quarter still gives us a possible 3 wins. The next section has Cas twice and Widnes away but a run of four away games which could be taxing.

The third group is where we can change things. We play Bulls away, then have a run of home games against London, Wigan, Hull, Leeds and Widnes, then go to Catalan away. This is the section where I see us causing a fuss. We should be playing more as a team by then, we will have a lot of home games with hopefully a good loud following and the dry ground will suit our style of play.

The fourth section is tough but we have Cas and Hull KR to finish so if we need points to push up to 8 or push away from relegation those two are the must wins.

Of course it means nothing on paper, but that's how i see the season going.

It was the manner of the defeat! Easy for you to say when you werent there. Body language appauling. We paid good money yesterday we were a beaten team before we got on the pitch. Cant believe a coach can pick the same wing/centre combination that Fetherstone ran rings around. Agar seems to have a obsession with the forwards that wasn't the reason we lost yesterday yes it didn't help but our attitude was all wrong, tactics, pretence effort. VERY POOR

. Wigan were there for the taking. No doubt boots n all and SL show will say gallant effort by Wakefield but apart from a handful the performance was woeful.

This sums it up for me.

Given the team selection and looking at the games coming up I get the feeling that yesterdays game was treated by the coaching staff as nothing more than a training run for the main events over the next fortnight. I get the impression that the fall out of that tactic was that mindset being taken up by some of the players, hence an impression of them being at less than 100%. Whether this was really the case I don't know but it kind of looked that way from the outside looking in and it wouldn't be the first time Agar has used that tactic for the Wigan away game.

I agree effort must be there. Tatui gave 110% yesterday. What the hell were Sykes ko's about!That is not effort at all.

I do think we need to get the "there for the taking" thing clear.
The only players that were not regulars was Hampshire at full back who will clearly be their next big thing.
Manfredi on the wing
Greg Burke, who quite a few Wigan fans rate very highly and have been caling for his inclussion in the team.

All the others are first teamers though they have got some good rotation

Big gamble to think he can change 4 or 5 players next week and they will instantly perform good enough as a team to get the win. I would have understood the mentality if for example Wildie had been in the 17 (because McShane loses his effectiveness having to do 80 mins) and Washbrook had started at LF and Walshaw wasn't propping, but can't see how yesterdays team selection and performance put us any nearer to being capable of stringing a winning performance together.

Weren't there something like 7 players who played in the WCC who didn't play? That being the case we had a better chance than normal to beat them and frankly never looked like doing so.

Off the top of my head 3 of their first choice three quarter line weren't playing nor Pettybourne

Maybe so,but their squad as more quality in depth than ours and will allways have.They will always have the pick of the crop,that's what money and success does I'm afraid,when they played the Roosters that showed that even our best clubs are well behind the ARL.....that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it.