|
FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > Same old same old |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 411 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2015 | Nov 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
fonds noirs/Sid.gif FAIL TO PREPARE,PREPARE TO FAIL:fonds noirs/Sid.gif |
|
| Quote: Albion "I thought I'd try and give some balanced opinion on what was happening today, being a neutral and all - I can understand how you are reacting.
I dread to think what JK's training methods are, it seemed to me like you had no structure in attack or defence. Some have pointed to your defence being the problem, but your attack was a just as bad.
You had five consecutive sets on our line, yet you didn't even threaten scoring once. There was a lack of movement, hardly any dummy runners and it resorted in you either trying to barge over the line or utilise the kick which was poorly executed.
To me you seem like you have the potential to be a decent passing side and you have a decent front row, but I think JK's gameplan is non -existant. No impact off the bench and there was a player who I had not heard of before who looked completely unfit.
IMO you need a new coach to bring new ideas in and try and give the club a different atmosphere and shake it up a little.'"
James Graham?
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4591 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
41301_1618663057.jpg Wakefields roller coaster ride continues.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_41301.jpg |
|
| Quote: Albion "I thought I'd try and give some balanced opinion on what was happening today, being a neutral and all - I can understand how you are reacting.
I dread to think what JK's training methods are, it seemed to me like you had no structure in attack or defence. Some have pointed to your defence being the problem, but your attack was a just as bad.
You had five consecutive sets on our line, yet you didn't even threaten scoring once. There was a lack of movement, hardly any dummy runners and it resorted in you either trying to barge over the line or utilise the kick which was poorly executed.
To me you seem like you have the potential to be a decent passing side and you have a decent front row, but I think JK's gameplan is non -existant. No impact off the bench and there was a player who I had not heard of before who looked completely unfit.
IMO you need a new coach to bring new ideas in and try and give the club a different atmosphere and shake it up a little.'"
That would be Jarrod Hickey, a complete waste of time and money.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 13798 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
29100_1291104497.jpg 1/10:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_29100.jpg |
|
| Quote: Albion "I thought I'd try and give some balanced opinion on what was happening today, being a neutral and all - I can understand how you are reacting.
I dread to think what JK's training methods are, it seemed to me like you had no structure in attack or defence. Some have pointed to your defence being the problem, but your attack was a just as bad.
You had five consecutive sets on our line, yet you didn't even threaten scoring once. There was a lack of movement, hardly any dummy runners and it resorted in you either trying to barge over the line or utilise the kick which was poorly executed.
To me you seem like you have the potential to be a decent passing side and you have a decent front row, but I think JK's gameplan is non -existant. No impact off the bench and there was a player who I had not heard of before who looked completely unfit.
IMO you need a new coach to bring new ideas in and try and give the club a different atmosphere and shake it up a little.'"
You've summed up what a lot of posters have felt for a while. The attack has been an issue for the majority of the season, the defence appears to have gone walkies now. The last 4 games don't make pleasant reading.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 10926 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2021 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
15993_1515231183.jpeg [color=#400000:2dasnjxb]"Wakefields Sporting Crusader"[/color:2dasnjxb]
[b:2dasnjxb][color=#FF0000:2dasnjxb]For the latest details on the Stadium for Wakefield campaign, log onto [url:2dasnjxb]http://www.swag-online.co.uk[/url:2dasnjxb][/color:2dasnjxb][/b:2dasnjxb]
[b:2dasnjxb][color=#0000FF:2dasnjxb]For the latest details on the Supporters Trust, log onto [url:2dasnjxb]http://wakefield.rlfans.com[/url:2dasnjxb][/color:2dasnjxb][/b:2dasnjxb]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_15993.jpeg |
|
| Quote: Albion "I thought I'd try and give some balanced opinion on what was happening today, being a neutral and all - I can understand how you are reacting.
I dread to think what JK's training methods are, it seemed to me like you had no structure in attack or defence. Some have pointed to your defence being the problem, but your attack was a just as bad.
You had five consecutive sets on our line, yet you didn't even threaten scoring once. There was a lack of movement, hardly any dummy runners and it resorted in you either trying to barge over the line or utilise the kick which was poorly executed.
To me you seem like you have the potential to be a decent passing side and you have a decent front row, but I think JK's gameplan is non -existant. No impact off the bench and there was a player who I had not heard of before who looked completely unfit.
IMO you need a new coach to bring new ideas in and try and give the club a different atmosphere and shake it up a little.'"
Great summary - amazing how some can see it in one game!
| | | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 36101 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
10363_1334937642.jpg SUPPORT SWAG...:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_10363.jpg |
|
| Quote: Albion "I thought I'd try and give some balanced opinion on what was happening today, being a neutral and all - I can understand how you are reacting.
I dread to think what JK's training methods are, it seemed to me like you had no structure in attack or defence. Some have pointed to your defence being the problem, but your attack was a just as bad.
You had five consecutive sets on our line, yet you didn't even threaten scoring once. There was a lack of movement, hardly any dummy runners and it resorted in you either trying to barge over the line or utilise the kick which was poorly executed.
To me you seem like you have the potential to be a decent passing side and you have a decent front row, but I think JK's gameplan is non -existant. No impact off the bench and there was a player who I had not heard of before who looked completely unfit.
IMO you need a new coach to bring new ideas in and try and give the club a different atmosphere and shake it up a little.'"
Quote: Albion "Great summary - amazing how some can see it in one game!
Funny but I remember Kear coming in and sorting that all out after Smith and we were all mighty impressed by Kears training methods and organisation - you and me included included.
So are we suggesting he's forgotten how to do all that and somehow in 5 years he's deteriorated that much, come on. He may be using boring negative tactics but even they should work far better than they are doing if the players had that nouse to carry them out. Lets be right here, he's giving them the easiest possible game plan and they can't even manage that, yet folk are seriously suggesting a new Coach will give them a new exciting brand of Rugby. We may not like kicking early, I don't but It's Tommy Lee who's kicking it badly, with over a 100 SL games under his belt Kear should be able to trust him.
It may be time for Kear to move on, but IMO we are kidding ourselves if we think another Coach will get any better from this lot apart from maybe a spurt of extra effort at the start. The truth is most of them are simply nowhere near good enough for SL, that's why we have them. They have played way beyond themselves for most of the season but now it's over.
Murphy, George, Amor, Johnson and perhaps Marriano may one day be SL players but that's it. Our halfbacks are nowhere near, Wildie and Hyde are nothing like, I have trouble working out what Lee is whilst Davey the only one with a Rugby brain is so small it's scary.
Two years ago we were watching players like Brough and Drew and perhaps they flattered Kears coaching, but in fairness these players do the opposite. I saw very little yesterday that had anything to do with Coaching and everything to do with players who couldn't do the basics required of them in SL. They have done their best but most are years off being Saints standard if obviously at all.
I'm a realist, I accept it's easier to sack a Coach than players. Personally I don't blame either especially though they play their part. I look at a owner who was given a lifeline at the start of the season with a team that over performed and then utterly failed to invest and push on. He didn't take the risks required and did it on the cheap in true Trinity style. He didn't tie up his Coach, his players but above all he added no quality to a team that anyone could see would run out of fuel very quickly if not improved. I'm sick of hearing that his hands are tied until franchise, b*llocks they are - he didn't need to break the bank to add a hooker and a S/H, especially if they had had the bottle to send Hickey packing.
I'll put it simply, we were never serious about SL on the field this season and it shows. If it was a calculated gamble it's failed as we are losing all the support and goodwill brought to the club since 2004. We are right back to the days of 2001 and for that the old and new regimes are to blame IMO not JK or his players.
So basically I don't think it's a great summary because it's over simplistic and misses far to mush of the "grey area" stuff which is not the posters fault - but a lot of us on here know it's far more complex.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15521 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2020 | May 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
50722_1319672516.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_50722.jpg |
|
| Quote: vastman "I'll put it simply, we were never serious about SL on the field this season and it shows. If it was a calculated gamble it's failed as we are losing all the support and goodwill brought to the club since 2004. We are right back to the days of 2001 and for that the old and new regimes are to blame IMO not JK or his players.
So basically I don't think it's a great summary because it's over simplistic and misses far to mush of the "grey area" stuff which is not the posters fault - but a lot of us on here know it's far more complex.'"
I disagree with the first statement and agree with the second.
| | | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 36101 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
10363_1334937642.jpg SUPPORT SWAG...:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_10363.jpg |
|
| Quote: bren2k "I disagree with the first statement and agree with the second.'"
Re-reading it I should have but "not just JK and his players" which is more balanced.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 793 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2016 | Dec 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| well vasty..your mate screwed it up well didn't he!!!!
| | | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
43457_1320063455.jpg READ THE AUP:
//forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=438945&tsmp=1381997916:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_43457.jpg |
|
| Quote: vastman "Funny but I remember Kear coming in and sorting that all out after Smith and we were all mighty impressed by Kears training methods and organisation - you and me included included.
So are we suggesting he's forgotten how to do all that and somehow in 5 years he's deteriorated that much, come on. He may be using boring negative tactics but even they should work far better than they are doing if the players had that nouse to carry them out. Lets be right here, he's giving them the easiest possible game plan and they can't even manage that, yet folk are seriously suggesting a new Coach will give them a new exciting brand of Rugby. We may not like kicking early, I don't but It's Tommy Lee who's kicking it badly, with over a 100 SL games under his belt Kear should be able to trust him.
It may be time for Kear to move on, but IMO we are kidding ourselves if we think another Coach will get any better from this lot apart from maybe a spurt of extra effort at the start. The truth is most of them are simply nowhere near good enough for SL, that's why we have them. They have played way beyond themselves for most of the season but now it's over.
Murphy, George, Amor, Johnson and perhaps Marriano may one day be SL players but that's it. Our halfbacks are nowhere near, Wildie and Hyde are nothing like, I have trouble working out what Lee is whilst Davey the only one with a Rugby brain is so small it's scary.
Two years ago we were watching players like Brough and Drew and perhaps they flattered Kears coaching, but in fairness these players do the opposite. I saw very little yesterday that had anything to do with Coaching and everything to do with players who couldn't do the basics required of them in SL. They have done their best but most are years off being Saints standard if obviously at all.
I'm a realist, I accept it's easier to sack a Coach than players. Personally I don't blame either especially though they play their part. I look at a owner who was given a lifeline at the start of the season with a team that over performed and then utterly failed to invest and push on. He didn't take the risks required and did it on the cheap in true Trinity style. He didn't tie up his Coach, his players but above all he added no quality to a team that anyone could see would run out of fuel very quickly if not improved. I'm sick of hearing that his hands are tied until franchise, b*llocks they are - he didn't need to break the bank to add a hooker and a S/H, especially if they had had the bottle to send Hickey packing.
I'll put it simply, we were never serious about SL on the field this season and it shows. If it was a calculated gamble it's failed as we are losing all the support and goodwill brought to the club since 2004. We are right back to the days of 2001 and for that the old and new regimes are to blame IMO not JK or his players.
So basically I don't think it's a great summary because it's over simplistic and misses far to mush of the "grey area" stuff which is not the posters fault - but a lot of us on here know it's far more complex.'"
This is going to come as a shock vastman, but to a degree or two i think your mainly right.
I agree with you on Kear ( i've calmed down since sunday, i didn't agree then!!!) he cannot have become such a crap coach in his tenure from his saviour days, I think he is a total bufoon for picking Hickey 5 weeks out of five when everyone even away supporters can see that.
I think mr Glover (if he truly believed/believes) should have tried harder to bring in some short term quality (where we needed it) at about game 3-4 when confidence was high and we had picked up points.
I'm not sure about the bit about losing all the good work since 2004, 2009 and 2010 wiped much of that away and you only have to look at our attendances dropping in those two years to see those facts back up that statement. I do think people are hugely frustrated and my only argument in the defence of anyone at the club, from Mr Glover down to the tea lady is that it must also be very frustrating dealing with this franchise scenario every working minute of every working day.
Its not just the overt unfairness of it, its everything that comes along with it, unsettling players and coaches, to spend or not to spend, to throw untried players in or stick with broken players who are still up for the fight.
We are a hugely damaged club at the minute, and we all still need to be strong.
For our own dignity we need to finish above Crusaders, then we can stick two fingers up at the RFL and say well you couldn't relegate us no matter how hard you tried and (if they kick us iut) this decision makes you look totally corrupt and we are glad to be no further part of it.
The Players i believe are pretty much broken, yes Kear should be resting them and playing others, but we should question wether booing and shouting at them (i was guilty of both on sunday) is actually only making us feel better and offering nothing to the players (who don't pick the side).
In short i think as a club are showing the signs of stress as a direct result of the franchise system, we know we are staring down the barrel of a gun and while we all know there is fault on all sides, the biggest culprit in this is the RFL for putting any of its members in such a stressful situation, they have a duty of care over there members which IMO they have shown total disregard for.
IMO we have shown them enough this year that we are capable of to warrant a franchise, maybe not a full 3 year one, but a conditional, " get your ground built or at the very least steel in the ground by the end of this next SL season or you're out" that i would consider a fair compromise for the circumstances.
I think for ourselves as hard as it is, we must remain strong until the 26th and then take it from there, we are all aware of the situation well enough to know that it is not of the doing of AG, JE, JK the players or anyone else at the club, it is the doing of the governing body and for all the faults of the people we are currently venting our spleen at, we should remember that.
We/they could have done more, but we have come a long way in my eyes, if not in the eyes of the decision makers.
We know we are a far better shout than other clubs in SL, but the decision rests with others, and its SELF EDITED frustrating.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1380 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
16086_1706206167.jpg [color=#0000FF:2dzs77ey]Always read the small print[/color:2dzs77ey]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_16086.jpg |
|
| Quote: kinleycat "I think mr Glover (if he truly believed/believes) should have tried harder to bring in some short term quality (where we needed it) at about game 3-4 when confidence was high and we had picked up points.'"
I have asked this question quite a few times before and it is not aimed at specific person, but who are these quality players we have not tried hard enough to bring in?
If Kyle Eastmond is the one being referred to, Saints hit an injury crisis and since his recall has pretty much been a 1st team regular.
Which club has such riches of quality throughout that they can loan out the quality we haven't tried hard enough to get?
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3840 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
50836_1298143372.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_50836.jpg |
|
| Had Saints not had an injury crisis Kyle Eastmond would have been playing for us that is certain so I don't think people can argue that we haven't tried to sign quality.
The main problem is that players of high quality are not available during the middle of the season because they are under contract at other clubs who are not willing to let them go.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
43457_1320063455.jpg READ THE AUP:
//forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=438945&tsmp=1381997916:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_43457.jpg |
|
| Quote: trinfan71 "I have asked this question quite a few times before and it is not aimed at specific person, but who are these quality players we have not tried hard enough to bring in?
If Kyle Eastmond is the one being referred to, Saints hit an injury crisis and since his recall has pretty much been a 1st team regular.
Which club has such riches of quality throughout that they can loan out the quality we haven't tried hard enough to get?'"
Admittedly it's a tough one, and i don't think they are growing on trees, but at times i've seen better Championship players than what, at times we've had. What compels the problem is the signings that have been made, have been largely uninspiring, one that should never have been let out of the airport.
We employ enough people at the club that live and breathe RL at all levels to identify players, following game 1 as soon as Mr Glover took over and there was an expression that we could spend money we should have been on it, from lower leagues, reserves over seas or wherever.
Consistently over the years we have seen others dig up these players, the fact that we are not capable when it matters says either there is not the talent to spot it at the club or not the will.
Eastmond, i'm not sure about, he destroyed us on sunday but put him (with a bad attititude, which was reported at the time) into our squad and he would achieve little.
We started off the season with a poor side, which showed guts, we IMO should have doubled our efforts to bring in the right type of players, we haven't and that is a mistake, who's mistake i don't know.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 36101 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
10363_1334937642.jpg SUPPORT SWAG...:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_10363.jpg |
|
| Quote: altofts wildcat "Had Saints not had an injury crisis Kyle Eastmond would have been playing for us that is certain so I don't think people can argue that we haven't tried to sign quality.
The main problem is that players of high quality are not available during the middle of the season because they are under contract at other clubs who are not willing to let them go.'"
That's not totally the case as far as I'm led to believe. We tried to get him on the cheap by getting Saints to pay more of his wage, typical Trinity style. This may have worked but as you say events moved on as we dragged our feet and Saints needed him and the rest is history.
This was the first time the new regime really started to worry me - this sort of thing is straight out of the Ted book of tricks. However AG was promising a new era and considering our relatively low wage bill and the apparent loyalty of the fans in terms of attendances this was IMO an ideal opportunity to show some intent even if it meant paying over the odds just this once. Not just to us but to the team and to the game, a genuine International class player at BV, even if only on loan is a start.
For me the new regime has shown even less ambition on the pitch than the old one. As far as I'm concerned AG has no excuse, who care what the franchise brings it should have had no effect on what we did this season in terms of bringing in the best available. Yes we were handicapped at the start but that's gone now. Fact is Eastmond was available and we blew it because we are playing at being a SL team IMHO.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
43457_1320063455.jpg READ THE AUP:
//forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=438945&tsmp=1381997916:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_43457.jpg |
|
| Quote: vastman "That's not totally the case as far as I'm led to believe. We tried to get him on the cheap by getting Saints to pay more of his wage, typical Trinity style. This may have worked but as you say events moved on as we dragged our feet and Saints needed him and the rest is history.
This was the first time the new regime really started to worry me - this sort of thing is straight out of the Ted book of tricks. However AG was promising a new era and considering our relatively low wage bill and the apparent loyalty of the fans in terms of attendances this was IMO an ideal opportunity to show some intent even if it meant paying over the odds just this once. Not just to us but to the team and to the game, a genuine International class player at BV, even if only on loan is a start.
For me the new regime has shown even less ambition on the pitch than the old one. As far as I'm concerned AG has no excuse, who care what the franchise brings it should have had no effect on what we did this season in terms of bringing in the best available. Yes we were handicapped at the start but that's gone now. Fact is Eastmond was available and we blew it because we are playing at being a SL team IMHO.'"
Again, by and large i agree, but that quote is absolutely 1000% wrong
The franchise is absolutely a factor, not in our wanting to sign the best, but in players wanting to come to us, that are of a higher calibre.
I think we have been very poor (perhaps unlucky with Moore and his injury) in our recruitment from the takeover.
Everything is a factor, either to the RFL or to us, our past history and our debts, tales of players not getting paid, broken promises, books of tricks, starting to build a team after everyone else, the franchise doubt, the bad PR......
The list goes on and on and on and it all forms somebody's view of us and their willingness to be involved, and that is also one reason behind the huge apathy towards the club from within the city, which is also a hugely relevant factor, but maybe thats for another day........
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 36101 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
10363_1334937642.jpg SUPPORT SWAG...:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_10363.jpg |
|
| Quote: kinleycat "Again, by and large i agree, but that quote is absolutely 1000% wrong
The franchise is absolutely a factor, not in our wanting to sign the best, but in players wanting to come to us, that are of a higher calibre.
I think we have been very poor (perhaps unlucky with Moore and his injury) in our recruitment from the takeover.
Everything is a factor, either to the RFL or to us, our past history and our debts, tales of players not getting paid, broken promises, books of tricks, starting to build a team after everyone else, the franchise doubt, the bad PR......
The list goes on and on and on and it all forms somebody's view of us and their willingness to be involved, and that is also one reason behind the huge apathy towards the club from within the city, which is also a hugely relevant factor, but maybe thats for another day........'"
Think you took it a bit literally, should have said best available under the circumstances we found ourselves in - in whuch case Eastmond fitted the bill IMO.
| | |
| |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
3.7724609375:5
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | 19.65M | 2,193 | 80,155 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wigan |
29 |
768 |
338 |
430 |
48 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Hull KR |
29 |
731 |
344 |
387 |
44 |
Warrington |
29 |
769 |
351 |
418 |
42 |
Leigh |
29 |
580 |
442 |
138 |
33 |
Salford |
28 |
556 |
561 |
-5 |
32 |
St.Helens |
28 |
618 |
411 |
207 |
30 |
|
Catalans |
27 |
475 |
427 |
48 |
30 |
Leeds |
27 |
530 |
488 |
42 |
28 |
Huddersfield |
27 |
468 |
658 |
-190 |
20 |
Castleford |
27 |
425 |
735 |
-310 |
15 |
Hull FC |
27 |
328 |
894 |
-566 |
6 |
LondonB |
27 |
317 |
916 |
-599 |
6 |
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wakefield |
27 |
1032 |
275 |
757 |
52 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Toulouse |
26 |
765 |
388 |
377 |
37 |
Bradford |
28 |
723 |
420 |
303 |
36 |
York |
29 |
695 |
501 |
194 |
32 |
Widnes |
27 |
561 |
502 |
59 |
29 |
Featherstone |
27 |
634 |
525 |
109 |
28 |
|
Sheffield |
26 |
626 |
526 |
100 |
28 |
Doncaster |
26 |
498 |
619 |
-121 |
25 |
Halifax |
26 |
509 |
650 |
-141 |
22 |
Batley |
26 |
422 |
591 |
-169 |
22 |
Swinton |
28 |
484 |
676 |
-192 |
20 |
Barrow |
25 |
442 |
720 |
-278 |
19 |
Whitehaven |
25 |
437 |
826 |
-389 |
18 |
Dewsbury |
27 |
348 |
879 |
-531 |
4 |
Hunslet |
1 |
6 |
10 |
-4 |
0 |
|